Commitments and Contingencies
|6 Months Ended|
Jun. 30, 2016
|Commitments and Contingencies [Text Block]||
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
On December 22, 2015 we entered into a lease for new office space for a 12 month term, with a monthly rent payment of approximately $6,500 per month plus additional charges.
On December 17, 2015 we entered into a sublease agreement for our former office space with a third party with a lease term starting January 1, 2016 to February 28, 2018. The average monthly rent to be received under this sub-lease is approximately $15,000 per month, over the sub-lease term. At December 31, 2015 the present value of the negative cash flows over this sub-lease term was approximately $433,000 and this amount plus a real estate commission paid to find the sub-lease tenant of approximately $20,000, resulted in a total $453,000 that was recognized as an abandonment loss in 2015. The long-term portion of deferred lease abandonment liability was approximately $113,000 and the short-term portion of deferred lease abandonment liability of approximately $167,000 was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2016. The long-term portion of deferred lease abandonment liability was $196,938 and the short-term portion of deferred lease abandonment liability of $236,529 was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2015. We have a standard indemnification arrangement under this sublease agreement that require us to indemnify the sublessee against liabilities and claims incurred in connection with the premises covered by the Company’s lease. The term of this indemnification agreement is from the time of execution of the agreement to its expiration. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is $75,000, which is covered by a letter of credit that is outstanding as of June 30, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had not accrued a liability for this indemnification because the likelihood of incurring a payment obligation in connection with this indemnification is remote.
The future minimum lease payments required under the non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (rounded in millions):
Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $0.4 million due in the future under non-cancelable subleases.
Our former Chief Financial Officer filed a complaint against the Company and Seth Grae, President and Chief Executive Officer, with the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia (the “Fairfax County Complaint”), and a separate complaint against the Company with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (the “OSHA Complaint”) on March 9, 2015.
The Fairfax County Complaint contained two claims for damages. The first claim alleged that the Company and Mr. Grae made defamatory statements regarding the former Chief Financial Officer. The claim demands at least $1,000,000 in compensatory damages; costs, including reasonable fees for attorneys; and punitive damages of $1,000,000. The second claim alleges that the Company breached the former Chief Financial Officer’s employment contract by not paying the former Chief Financial Officer $15,507 for paid time off, and demands additional compensatory damages of at least $15,507.
In November 2015, subsequent to the above Fairfax County Complaint being filed, our legal counsel was notified by the attorney representing the former Chief Financial Officer that the former Chief Financial Officer has voluntarily decided to nonsuit the above Fairfax County Complaint. The nonsuit order was entered on November 30, 2015. A nonsuit is essentially a voluntary dismissal of the case without prejudice, meaning that he is dismissing the case but that he can refile the suit at a later time. The nonsuit statute for refiling this case provides that the lawsuit may be refiled within the longer of the original statute of limitations period or 6 months from the filing date of this the nonsuit order. The case has not been re-filed, and the defamation claim is now time-barred.
The OSHA Complaint alleges that the Company unlawfully retaliated against the former Chief Financial Officer for challenging allegedly improper actions of the Company by making allegedly defamatory statements and terminating him from his employment with the Company. The former Chief Financial Officer’s demand for damages is for back pay, front pay, and special damages. The complaint did not specify the amount of damages sought. OSHA has not contacted the Company to date regarding this complaint and there have been no actions taken against the Company.
The Company believes that the above OSHA Compliant made by the former Chief Financial Officer is without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself if it is contacted by OSHA in the future. As of June 30, 2016, the balance of the legal fees owed was approximately $16,000 and are expected to be paid by the Company’s insurance carrier.
The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef