10KSB: Optional form for annual and transition reports of small business issuers [Section 13 or 15(d), not S-B Item 405]
Published on September 27, 2006
_____________________________________________________________
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-KSB
(Mark
One)
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF
1934
For
the
fiscal year ended: June
30, 2006
[
]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For
the
transitional period from __________________ to __________________
Commission
File No. 000-28543
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
----------------------------------------------------
(Name
of
Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)
|
NEVADA
|
91-1975651
|
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
8300
Greensboro Drive, Suite 800
McLean,
Virginia 22102
|
703.918.4904
|
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Office)
|
(Issuer
Telephone No. Including Area Code)
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common stock, $.001 par
value
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or such shorter period
that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
X
No __
Check
if
there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained,
to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes__
No
X
The
issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year are $0.
State
the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
was
sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a
specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): $70,018,308
The
number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of September
20,
2006 is
160,476,474.
1
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
F-1
|
2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
report contains forward-looking statements and information relating to Novastar
Resources Ltd., that are based on the beliefs of our management as well as
assumptions made by and information currently available to us. When used in
this
report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,”
“plan” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our
current view concerning future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties
and assumptions, including among many others: significant operating losses;
limited operating history; uncertainty of capital resources; the speculative
nature of our business; government regulations; operating hazards; competition;
the loss of key personnel; and other factors referenced in this and previous
filings. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially
from
those described in this report as anticipated, estimated or expected.
When
used
in this report, the terms “Novastar,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to
Novastar Resources Ltd. and its subsidiary TP Acquisition Corp (“TP
Acquisition”).
General
Overview
We
are
currently a mineral exploration company. We hold mineral leases and claims
for
properties located in Alabama, USA and North Queensland, Australia. These are
exploration stage mineral properties prospective for thorium, platinum group
metals (“Platinum Group Metals”) and other rare earth minerals (REM).
Our
objective is to become a global supplier of thorium to the nuclear energy
industry.
The
phosphate mineral monazite, which exists as a sand, contains concentrations
of
thorium oxide as well as other REM. All commercially viable thorium metal is
extracted from monazite.
Utilizing
thorium based nuclear fuels has several important societal benefits, such as
safety benefits, environmental benefits, and non-proliferation benefits. Thorium
is more abundant, more efficient and safer to use as a reactor fuel than
uranium. Also important, thorium fueled reactors leave behind very little
weapons grade plutonium.
To
this
end, we acquired, and may acquire, both physical properties and rights to
properties that contain monazite deposits. Properties of interest to us contain
both monazite stockpiles and in ground concentrations of monazite. As of the
date of this filing, we have not conducted any mining activities on any of
the
properties that we hold mineral leases and claims.
On
February 14, 2006, our newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary, TP Acquisition
Corp., and Thorium Power Inc., (“Thorium Power”) entered into a merger
agreement, which was amended on June 12, 2006 and again on August 8, 2006.
Under
the terms of the merger agreement TP Acquisition will merge with and into
Thorium Power, with Thorium Power, the surviving corporation, becoming a wholly
owned subsidiary of Novastar. We expect the merger to close in October
2006.
After
the
merger with Thorium Power is consummated, we will have two different lines
of
business, or business segments. Our primary business segment after the merger
will be research and development of proprietary nuclear fuel technology for
use
in nuclear power plants. This primary business line is Thorium Power’s current
business. Our second business segment will be mineral exploration as described
above and in more detail below.
3
Corporate
History
We
were
incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on February 2, 1999, under
the name of Aquistar
Ventures (USA) Inc. We were organized for the purpose of exploring for and,
if
possible, developing mineral properties primarily in the province of Ontario,
Canada, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Aquistar Ventures Inc. ("Aquistar
Canada"). Aquistar Canada was incorporated under the laws of the province of
British Columbia, Canada, on April 13, 1995 and is now inactive.
On
February 2, 2001, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock
of Custom Branded Networks, Inc. or CBN, a Delaware corporation, in exchange
for
25,000,000 shares of our common stock. We then changed our name to Custom
Branded Networks, Inc. on or about May 29, 2001. The business of CBN, the
Delaware corporation which was our wholly-owned subsidiary, was the provision
of
turnkey private label Internet solutions to businesses and private
organizations.
In
May of
2003 we began actively looking for other business opportunities that would
provide superior economic opportunity, and in January 2005 we retained
consultants to assist in the identification of opportunities in the nuclear
sector, particularly with respect to thorium fuel and technology. Effective
May
10, 2005, we changed our name to Novastar Resources Ltd. During the period
from
September through December 2005, we entered into three agreements to acquire
mining interests for two properties in Alabama and one property in Queensland,
Australia. Thereafter, on February 14, 2006, we entered into the merger
agreement with Thorium Power.
Employees
As
of
June 30, 2006, we had 2 employees,
both of
whom
were full-time employees. We
believe that our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.
We
use
consultants with specific skills to assist with various business functions
including evaluation, due diligence, acquisition initiatives, corporate
governance, business development, research and development and government
relations.
Government
Regulation
Mining
operations and exploration activities are subject to various national, state,
provincial and local laws and regulations in the United States, Canada and
Australia, as well as other jurisdictions, which govern prospecting,
development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational
health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous
substances and other matters. Based on future assay results, we will, either
directly or through a service contractor, make applications for those licenses,
permits and other authorizations required to conduct our exploration activities
on our leases and claims located in Alabama, USA and North Queensland,
Australia, respectively. To date, we have spent approximately $395,000 to
conduct our mineral exploration activities.
Such
approval may involve many levels of government (i.e. Federal, State, Provincial,
County and/or City approval), and we cannot predict whether all such approvals
will be successfully obtained.
Our
exploration projects are subject to various regulations governing protection
of
the environment, both in North America and in Australia. These laws are
continually changing and, as a general matter, are becoming more restrictive.
Management intends to conduct business in a way that safeguards public health
and the environment.
We
believe that we are and will continue to be in compliance in all material
respects with applicable statutes and regulations.
Changes
to laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where we own property or may
operate in the future could require additional capital expenditures and
increased operating costs. We are unable to predict what additional legislation
or regulatory requirements, if any, might be proposed or enacted, and how such
laws could impact the economics of its projects.
Management
expects that it will not incur material capital expenditures for environmental
control facilities until it determines that the market for its minerals will
support these and all costs of mining.
4
Competition
We
compete with other mining companies in connection with the acquisition of
prospective properties and mineral rights. There is competition for the limited
number of opportunities, some of which is with other companies having
substantially greater financial resources than us. As a result, we may have
difficulty acquiring attractive projects at reasonable prices.
We
believe no single company has sufficient market power to affect the price or
supply of thorium, rare earth minerals, platinum group metals or other minerals
in the world market.
Key
Developments in 2006
|
·
|
On
February 14, 2006 we entered into a merger agreement with Thorium
Power
Inc. and we anticipate the merger to occur in October
2006.
|
|
·
|
We
have hired a new management team and formed a technical advisory
board and
international advisory board, all with the capability to pursue other
growth opportunities in the nuclear power
industry.
|
|
·
|
We
have been able to raise in three separate private placements approximately
$17.4 million to support our business
segments.
|
Risk
Factors
WE
CONTINUE TO EXPERIENCE SIGNIFICANT OPERATING LOSSES.
We
adopted a new business model in mid-2005 to pursue the exploration of thorium
and other rare earth minerals and development opportunities, and have a limited
operating history in our current form. Since we reorganized our business, our
operating costs have exceeded our revenue in each quarter. We incurred
cumulative net losses of approximately $17,483,000 from the period June 28,
1999
(inception) to June 30, 2006. We may not be able to obtain or maintain any
level
of revenues in the future. If we are unsuccessful in these efforts, we may
never
achieve profitability.
OUR
LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO JUDGE OUR
PROSPECTS.
We
are an
exploration stage company that has a limited operating history upon which an
evaluation of us, our current business and our prospects can be based. You
should consider any purchase of our shares in light of the risks, expenses
and
problems frequently encountered by all companies in the early stages of
corporate development.
OUR
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES ARE UNCERTAIN.
For
the
twelve month period ending June 30, 2006, we had an operating loss of
$13,344,535. At June 30, 2006, we had a working capital surplus of $9,966,244
During the period from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006, we raised
approximately $17,500,000 in private placement transactions. While management
expects these proceeds will
meet
our foreseeable needs for at least the next 12 months, we may need to raise
additional capital by way of an offering of equity securities, an offering
of
debt securities, or by obtaining financing through a bank or other entity.
If we
need to obtain additional financing, that financing may not be available or
we
may not be able to obtain that financing on terms acceptable to us. If
additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, there
may
be a significant dilution in the value of our outstanding common
stock.
WE
FAILED
TO CAUSE THE RESALE REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO OUR MAY 2006 PRIVATE
PLACEMENT TO GO EFFECTIVE BEFORE THE REQUIRED EFFECTIVENESS DATE AND WE ARE
CURRENTLY SUBJECT TO LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AT A RATE OF APPROXIMATELY
$312,000 PER MONTH (WHICH IS PAYABLE IN CASH OR EQUITY AT THE OPTION OF THE
INVESTOR) SUBJECT TO A TOTAL CAP OF $1,870,000. WE WILL CONTINUE TO INCUR
THESE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT THAT WE FILED RELATING
TO THE INVESTORS' SHARES GOES EFFECTIVE.
Under the terms of a registration rights agreement entered into in connection
with our May 4, 2006 private placement, we became obligated to
file a resale registration statement relating to the shares sold in the
placement within 15 days of the filing of our registration statement on
Form S-4 relating to the securities being issued in our
contemplated merger with Thorium Power. We satisfied this obligation
when we filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 on June
29, 2006. The registration rights agreement requires us to, among other
things, use reasonable best efforts to cause the SB-2 to be declared effective
as soon as possible, but in any event not later than the earlier of (a) the
120th day following the closing date of the private placement and (b) the
fifth
trading day following the date on which we are notified by the SEC that
the SB-2 will not be reviewed or is no longer subject to further review and
comments. If the SB-2 is not declared effective within the time frame described
above, then we must issue to the investors in the May 2006 private
placement cash or additional units (at the investor’s option), as liquidated
damages, equal to 2% of the number of units for which the investor subscribed
on
each monthly anniversary of the failure to be declared effective (if the
failure
has not been cured by such date). If the SB-2 ceases to be effective after
the date first declared effective by the SEC and prior to the expiration
of the
effectiveness period described in the registration rights agreement,
then we must issue to each investor cash or additional units (at the
investor’s option), as liquidated damages, equal to 2% of the number of units
for which the investor subscribed on each monthly anniversary of the SB-2
ceasing to be effective (if the failure has not been cured by such date).
In no event, however, will the aggregate amount of cash or number of units
issued as liquidated damages in the case of (a) a failure to be declared
effective (as described above) or (b) the SB-2 ceasing to be effective (as
described above), exceed 12% of the amount of cash paid or the number of
units
paid for by the investor.
Since
the
120 day deadline for the effectiveness of the SB-2 has passed and since we
do not expect the SB-2 to go effective before October 4, 2006, we
expect that we will be obligated to pay the liquidated damages described
above for the first two months of delay. If, for any reason, the SB-2 does
not
go effective in October, then liquidated damages will continue to
accrue.
5
MINERAL
EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ARE SPECULATIVE IN NATURE.
Resource
exploration and development is a speculative business, characterized by a number
of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts
resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from
finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity
and
quality to return a profit from extraction. The marketability of minerals
acquired or discovered by us may be affected by numerous factors which are
beyond our control and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market
fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets
and processing equipment and such other factors as government regulations,
including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing
and
exporting of minerals and environmental protection, the combination of which
factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on investment
capital.
Substantial
expenditures are required to establish mineral reserves through drilling, to
develop metallurgical processes to extract the metal from the ore and, in the
case of new properties, to develop the mining and processing facilities and
infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. Although substantial benefits
may
be derived from the discovery of a major mineralized deposit, no assurance
can
be given that minerals will be discovered in sufficient quantities and grades
to
justify commercial operations or that funds required for development can be
obtained on a timely basis. Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and
production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental
permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors,
unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations
and work interruptions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined may
differ from that indicated by drilling results. Short term factors relating
to
reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the
processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on mining
operations and on the results of operations. Material changes in ore reserves,
grades, stripping ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability
of
any project.
WE
ARE AN
EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY, AND THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT A COMMERCIALLY VIABLE
DEPOSIT OR "RESERVE" EXISTS ON ANY PROPERTIES FOR WHICH WE HAVE, OR MIGHT
OBTAIN, AN INTEREST.
We
are an
exploration stage company and cannot be certain that a commercially viable
deposit, or “reserve,” exists on any properties for which we currently have or
may have an interest. Therefore, determination of the existence of a reserve
depends on appropriate and sufficient exploration work and the evaluation of
legal, economic, and environmental factors. If we fail to find a commercially
viable deposit on any of our properties, our financial condition and results
of
operations will be materially adversely affected.
Any
potential development and production of our exploration properties depends
upon
the results of exploration programs and/or feasibility studies and the
recommendations of duly qualified engineers and geologists. Such programs
require substantial additional funds. Any decision to further expand our
operations on these exploration properties is anticipated to involve
consideration and evaluation of several significant factors including, but
not
limited to:
|
o
|
costs
of bringing each property into production, including exploration
work,
preparation of production feasibility studies and construction of
production facilities;
|
|
o
|
availability
and costs of financing;
|
|
o
|
ongoing
costs of production;
|
|
o
|
market
prices for the minerals to be
produced;
|
6
|
o
|
environmental
compliance regulations and restraints;
and
|
|
o
|
political
climate and/or governmental regulation and
control.
|
OUR
BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION ARE SUBJECT TO THE RISKS APPLICABLE TO MINING
COMPANIES GENERALLY
Factors
beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered
from any resource properties we may acquire. Metal prices have fluctuated widely
in recent years. Government regulations relating to price, royalties, allowable
production and importing and exporting of minerals can adversely affect us.
There can be no certainty that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses
and permits that may be required to carry out exploration, development and
operations on any projects we may acquire and environmental concerns about
mining in general continue to be a significant challenge for all mining
companies.
WE
WILL
BE SUBJECT TO OPERATING HAZARDS, COMPETITION AND DOWNWARD PRICE FLUCTUATION
WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
Mineral
exploration involves many risks, which even a combination of experience,
knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. Our operations
will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to exploration,
development and production of metallic minerals, such as unusual or unexpected
formations, cave-ins or pollution, all of which could result in work stoppages,
damage to property and possible environmental damage. We do not have general
liability insurance covering our operations. Payment of any liabilities as
a
result could have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition.
Significant
and increasing competition exists for the limited number of mineral acquisition
opportunities available. As a result of this competition, some of which is
with
large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater
financial and technical resources than us, we may be unable to acquire
attractive mineral properties on terms it considers acceptable.
We
have
no control over the fluctuations in the prices of the thorium and other rare
earth minerals that we are exploring for. A significant decline in such prices
would severely reduce our value.
OUR
ACTIVITIES WILL BE SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER INDUSTRY REGULATIONS
WHICH
COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
Our
activities are subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government
agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation generally provides for
restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various
substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations,
which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation
may
result in imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of
operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact
assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which means
stricter standards and enforcement, fines and penalties for non-compliance
are
more stringent. In addition to existing laws, there can be new federal, state,
or local laws banning, restricting, or taxing mining activities planned by
us.
Environmental
assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility
for
companies and directors, officers and employees. The cost of compliance with
changes in governmental regulations could have an adverse effect on our
financial condition.
Our
operations, including exploration and development activities and commencement
of
production on its properties require permits from various federal, state,
provincial and local governmental authorities and such operations are and will
be governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, mining,
production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste
disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety
and
other matters. Companies engaged in the development and operation of mines
and
related facilities generally experience increased costs and delays in production
and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws,
regulations and permits.
7
Failure
to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may
result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory
or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may
include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of
additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations
may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the
mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed
for
violations of applicable laws or regulations and, in particular, environmental
laws.
WE
RELY
ON SETH GRAE AND CERTAIN OTHER KEY INDIVIDUALS AND THE LOSS OF MR. GRAE OR
ANY
OF THESE OTHER KEY INDIVIDUALS WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON US.
Our
success will depend upon Seth Grae and certain other key members of the
management team. Mr. Grae’s knowledge of the nuclear power industry, his network
of key contacts within that industry and in government and, in particular,
his
expertise in the potential use of thorium as a fuel in nuclear reactors, is
critical to the implementation of the prospective business model of the combined
company. Mr. Grae and these other individuals are a significant factor in our
future growth and success. The loss of the service of Mr. Grae or these other
key members of the management team would have a material adverse effect on
us.
We do not have key man insurance policies relating to Seth Grae or any other
key
individuals and does not anticipate obtaining any such insurance.
Mineral
Property Descriptions and Mining Contracts
On
September 14, 2005, we entered into an Assignment of Specific Mineral Rights
agreement (the “AGH Assignment Agreement”) with Charles Merchant, our former
Chief Executive Officer, who was conducting business under the name American
Graphite Holdings (“AGH”), an Alabama sole proprietorship, under which we were
assigned all of his mineral rights located on certain properties in Clay
County, Alabama and
commonly referred to as
the
Ashland Graphite Properties. In consideration of the assigned rights, we paid
to
AGH $100,000 in cash and issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock to AGH,
at
a deemed issued price of $0.001 per share. In addition, AGH is to receive a
$15.00 per ton net royalty if thorium/monazite removed from the leased
properties. In March of 2006, as contemplated by the merger agreement with
Thorium Power, the parties entered into Amendment No. 1 to the AGH Assignment
Agreement, whereby the parties agreed that the sole remedy available to AGH
for
breach of the AGH Assignment Agreement by us is the termination of the AGH
Assignment Agreement, and that no further relief or recourse, whether in law,
in
equity or otherwise, will be available to AGH.
On
September 30, 2005 we entered into a Mining Acquisition Agreement (the
“Acquisition Agreement”) with Walter Doyle whereby we agreed to acquire an
undivided 100% interest in and to any deposits of thorium, monazite and other
rare earth minerals on certain mining properties in Queensland, Australia.
The consideration paid by us to Mr. Doyle consisted of 5,000,000 shares of
restricted stock. In February, 2006, we purchased all such shares from Mr.
Doyle
for $400,000 and such shares were cancelled. Under the Acquisition Agreement,
we
operate the property subject to the agreement, and are granted the right to
prospect, explore, develop and engage in other mining work on and under the
property as we deem necessary and desirable, including bringing and erecting
buildings, plants, machinery and equipment. We are further permitted to remove
all metals and minerals derived from our operations as necessary for testing.
Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, Mr. Doyle is to retain
2.5%
of the gross proceeds received by us in any year from the sale of thorium,
monazite or rare earth minerals of commercial economic value mined from the
property, and any concentrates or other materials or products derived there
from, less (i) the cost of transportation to a smelter or other place of
treatment and (ii) any smelter or other treatment charges. In addition, we
are
to incur our proportionate share of the following amounts spent on or with
respect to exploration activities, to total not more than $695,000 as follows:
(i) expenditures of $125,000 by December 31, 2006; (ii) expenditures of an
additional $150,000 by December 31, 2007; (iii) expenditures of an additional
$140,000 by December 31, 2008; (iv) expenditures of an additional $140,000
by
December 31, 2009 and (v) expenditures of an additional $140,000 by December
31,
2010. In March of 2006, as contemplated by the merger agreement with Thorium
Power, the parties entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Acquisition Agreement,
whereby the parties agreed that the sole remedy available to Mr. Doyle for
breach of the Acquisition Agreement by us is the termination of the Acquisition
Agreement, and that no further relief or recourse, whether in law, in equity
or
otherwise, will be available to Mr. Doyle.
8
On
December 31,
2005 the Company entered into an agreement with CM Properties whereby certain
mineral leases in the Cleburne County District of Alabama can be assigned
to the
Company. The Company will assume 51% of a lease held by the lessee, who
subsequently became an officer of the Company but no longer serves as an
officer
as of June 30, 2006, for consideration of 2,000,000 restricted common shares
of
the Company. In addition, the Company must incur $1,500,000 on property
expenditures and for each $100,000 in additional expenditures; the Company
will
receive an additional 4% interest in the lease up to a maximum of an extra
40%
interest. Upon reaching a 91% interest, the lessee shall retain a 9% interest
and shall receive $17.50 per ounce of pure Platinum Group Metal (PGM) produced.
For each 2,500 ounces of PGM produced, the lessee shall receive an additional
1,000,000 restricted common shares of the Company, up to a maximum of 8,000,000
shares, for a period of two years from the acquisition of the Company’s 91%
interest being obtained. Aspects
of the contract remain executory, and the company has not issued the 2,000,000
shares, while entities controlled by CM Properties continue to oversee the
properties and are reimbursed by the Company for their services. In February
2006, the Company and CM Properties amended this lease agreement to make
the
sole remedy to CM Properties for a breach of the agreement by the Company
termination of the mineral lease agreements, with no further relief or recourse
against the Company.
Accordingly, the balance sheet does not reflect the value of the property
(this
value determined by the stock value of the 2 million shares at the date of
the agreement - $380,000) as an asset nor does it reflect the
Company's obligation to issue the shares (valued at the stock value
of $380,000) as common stock reserved for future issuance (an equity
account on the balance sheet).
Other
Property Descriptions
We
are
obligated to pay approximately $7,000 per month for office rent and
approximately another $2,000 per month for other fees for the rented
office space located at 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 800, McLean, Virginia
22102. The space is used by our executives for administrative
purposes. The term of the lease expires for one office on April 30, 2007
and for the other offices in the summer of 2007.
On
March
31, 2006, the Novastar, Thorium Power and their respective officers were served,
through their counsel, with a verified complaint by Raj Pamnani. Mr. Pamnani
alleges that Novastar and Thorium Power and their respective officers breached
an oral consulting agreement he alleges was entered into between Mr. Pamnani
and
Novastar and demands a combination of shares of unrestricted common stock of
Novastar and payment of monetary damages in the amount of $10 million plus
an
additional $5 million in punitive damages. The
action was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New
York, and Novastar filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint on May 23,
2006. On August 8, 2006, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement
whereby Mr. Pamnani irrevocably and forever waived and released any and all
claims against Novastar, Thorium Power and the other defendants named in the
complaint, through the date of execution of the Settlement Agreement, in return
for the issuance of 215,000 shares of common stock of Novastar, as well as
warrants to purchase 107,500 shares of Novastar common stock at a price of
$0.48
per share.
No
matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year to a vote
of
security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or
otherwise.
9
Market
Information
Our
common
stock is listed and traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. The following table sets
forth the high and low closing per share sales prices of our common stock as
reported on the OTC Bulletin Board for the quarterly fiscal periods presented
below. The quotations were obtained from the OTC Bulletin Board website and
reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission
and
may not represent actual transactions.
|
FISCAL
YEAR
|
QUARTER
ENDING
|
HIGH
|
LOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
June
30, 2006
|
$0.74
|
$0.43
|
|
|
March
31, 2006
|
$0.88
|
$0.19
|
|
|
December
31, 2005
|
$0.28
|
$0.14
|
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
$0.29
|
$0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
June
30, 2005
|
$0.22
|
$0.077
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
$0.22
|
$0.09
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
$0.29
|
$0.07
|
|
|
September
30, 2004
|
$0.04
|
$0.017
|
Holders
As
of
September 20, 2006, our common stock was held by 161 stockholders of record.
Dividends
We
have
never paid dividends. While any future dividends will be determined by our
directors after consideration of the earnings, financial condition and other
relevant factors, it is currently expected that available cash resources will
be
utilized in connection with our ongoing acquisition, exploration and development
programs. In certain situations where executives receive stock compensation,
we
may redeem a portion of the executive’s stock in order to provide the executive
with the cash necessary to pay taxes relating to that executive’s stock
compensation. Any such redemption would require board approval.
Section
15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - The Penny Stock
Rules
Our
shares are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as
amended that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers
who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and
accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000
or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding
$200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses). For transactions covered
by
this Section 15(g), the broker/dealer must make a special suitability
determination for the purchase and have received the purchaser's written
agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, Section 15(g)
may
affect the ability of broker/dealers to sell our securities and also may affect
your ability to sell your shares in the secondary market.
10
Section
15(g) also imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers
who
sell penny securities. These rules require a one page summary of certain
essential items. The items include the risk of investing in penny stocks in
both
public offerings and secondary marketing; terms important to in understanding
of
the function of the penny stock market, such as "bid" and "offer" quotes, a
dealers "spread" and broker/dealer compensation; the broker/dealer compensation,
the broker/dealers duties to its customers, including the disclosures required
by any other penny stock disclosure rules; the customers rights and remedies
in
causes of fraud in penny stock transactions; and, the NASD's toll free telephone
number and the central number of the North American Administrators Association,
for information on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their
associated persons.
Transfer
Agent
Our
transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Computershare Investor
Services, Shareholder Communications Department, 2 LaSalle Street, 3rd Floor,
Chicago, IL 60602. Its telephone number is 888-243-5445 and facsimile is
212-701-7664.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
Except
for sales previously disclosed in quarterly reports on form 10-QSB or in a
current report on Form 8-K filed by us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we have not sold any securities without registration under the
Securities Act of 1933. See Item 7 of Part II “Financial Statements - Note 9 -
Share Capital” for unregistered stock issuances for the year ended June 30,
2006.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements, together with the notes to those statements, included elsewhere
in
this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions such as statements of our plans,
objectives, expectations, and intentions. Our actual results may differ
materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements because
of
the risks and uncertainties inherent in future events.
We
engage
in the acquisition, exploration and evaluation of mineral rights in properties
containing thorium, as well as potentially other minerals. All
commercially viable thorium metal is extracted from monazite. The
phosphate mineral monazite exists as a sand and may contain concentrations
of
3.0% -12.0% thorium oxide as well as other rare earth minerals such as cerium,
lanthanum, yttrium and neodymium, and platinum group metals.
In
the
future, we may acquire rights to properties that contain monazite deposits.
Properties of interest to us would be both monazite stockpiles and in-ground
concentrations of mineral monazite.
The
current market for thorium is very limited. Our objective has been to become
a
supplier of thorium to be used in the future as fuel in nuclear energy industry.
Thorium can be used to power existing nuclear reactors using fuel designs
developed by Thorium Power. Thorium based nuclear fuels are believed to have
several important advantages over conventional nuclear fuels, such as
non-proliferation benefits, environmental benefits and possible cost and safety
benefits.
We
expect
to generate revenues in the future through the sale of thorium, platinum group
metals and other rare earth minerals, but we have not done so to date. We have
not conducted any mining activities on any of the properties that we hold
mineral leases and claims for.
On
February 14, 2006, we and our newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, TP
Acquisition Corp., and Thorium Power, Inc. entered into a merger agreement,
which was amended on June 12, 2006 and again on August 8, 2006. Under the terms
of the merger agreement TP Acquisition will merge with and into Thorium Power,
with Thorium Power, the surviving corporation, becoming a wholly owned
subsidiary of Novastar. We expect the merger to close in October
2006.
11
After
the
merger with Thorium Power is consummated, we will have two different lines
of
business or business segments. Our primary business segment after the merger
will be research and development of proprietary nuclear fuel technology for
use
in nuclear power plants. This primary business segment is Thorium Power’s
current business. Our second business segment is mineral exploration as
described above and in more detail below.
Outlook
As
of the
date of this report, there is not significant global demand for thorium as
a
source of nuclear fuel. We believe that there will be significant increases
in
demand for thorium at some future point; however, we are unable to predict
when
or if this will occur.
The
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a United Nations organization,
submitted an official report on the thorium nuclear fuel cycle in May of 2005.
On July 6, 2005 we issued a press release commenting on this report. The IAEA
report publicly promotes the significant benefits of thorium as a nuclear fuel.
In addition, on page # 91 of its report, the IAEA recommended that companies
augment the exploration and mining of thorium to insure the availability of
sufficient supplies of reactor grade thorium.
To
date,
we have invested $1,350,000 in Thorium Power and upon consummation of the
merger, we will acquire Thorium Power and it will become our wholly-owned
subsidiary.
We
have
worked with the government relations firm Capitol Project Partners, LLC, to
inform government officials on the value of thorium and a thorium nuclear fuel
cycle.
In
addition to the acquisition of thorium properties and mineral rights, we believe
that we may have potential revenue opportunities to supplement our business
since other metals of commercial significance can be extracted from our
properties. These would include platinum group metals and rare earth minerals
of
the yttrium group. Rare earth minerals can be divided into two groups: the
yttrium group, containing yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, and the
dysprosium group, containing europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium,
and erbium. Mineral monazite only contains concentrations of rare earth minerals
classified in the yttrium group.
Management
believes that our properties may also contain zirconium oxide. Zirconium metal
is used as an alloy to coat metal parts to provide heat and corrosion
resistance. It is widely used in nuclear reactors and management believes that
there may be a growing use in the automotive industry to replace chrome.
Management believes that platinum may also be present on our properties.
Platinum may be used to coat machinery parts to impart wear resistance and
to
electronic components to enhance electrical conductivity. Platinum is also
widely used in the automotive industry for catalytic converters and in the
jewelry industry.
We
may
process and stockpile rare earth minerals as a by-product of mining and refining
mineral monazite into thorium oxide. We intend to identify potential buyers
of
rare earth minerals both in the United States and abroad. With approximately
80%
of world rare earth metals production sourced from the Peoples' Republic of
China and no rare earth mineral mines operating in North America, rare earth
minerals may become an important strategic commodity. We believe that there
may
be short and intermediate term revenue generating opportunities from sales
of
rare earth minerals. Some of the commercial applications for rare earth minerals
include, but are not limited to:
|
o
|
industrial
super alloys used in the aerospace and nuclear
industries
|
|
o
|
crystals
manufactured for the production of
lasers
|
|
o
|
the
refining of petroleum products
|
|
o
|
in
magnetic refrigeration technology
|
12
|
o
|
as
catalysts used in the manufacture of
fuel-cells
|
|
o
|
in
cellular phones and other wireless
equipment
|
|
o
|
magnetic
plastic technology used in computer data memory
devices
|
|
o
|
fiber-optic
lines and to color, polarize and polish
glass
|
|
o
|
the
creation of high temperature
superconductors
|
|
o
|
catalytic
converters for the automotive
industry
|
We
have
not taken any core samples from the properties located in Australia. No further
mineral property descriptions are available for public dissemination at this
time.
Plan
of Operation
If
the
merger with Thorium Power is not consummated, then it will be very difficult
for
us to effect our business plan. Major cash commitments in the next fiscal year
are related to the funding of Thorium Power’s business, corporate administration
and operations, and proposed exploration activities.
At
June
30, 2006, our total assets were $16,589,832. Liabilities as of June 30, 2006
totaled $5,273,588. We had working capital surplus of $9,966,244
at June
30, 2006.
On
May 4,
2006, we closed a $15,000,000 private placement (raised $15,580,431) for the
purpose of acquiring, exploring and developing thorium and rare earth minerals
properties as well as to assist us in connection with the planned acquisition
of
Thorium Power and the development of Thorium Power’s business.
While
management expects these proceeds and our present working capital will meet
our foreseeable needs for at least the next 12 months, we may need to raise
additional capital by way of an offering of equity securities, an offering
of
debt securities, or by obtaining financing through a bank or other entity.
If we
need to obtain additional financing, that financing may not be available or
we
may not be able to obtain that financing on terms acceptable to us. If
additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, there
may
be a significant dilution in the value of our outstanding common
stock.
In
the
next 12-24 months we expect to incur Research and Development expenses related
to Thorium Power Inc,’s development of its patents for its proprietary nuclear
fuel design.
13
Results
of Operations - Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006 and
2005
Summary
The
following table summarizes the results of our operations during the fiscal
year
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and provides information regarding the dollar
and
percentage increase or (decrease) from the 2006 fiscal year to the 2005 fiscal
year.
|
Line
Item
|
6/30/06
|
|
6/30/05
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Percentage
Increase (Decrease)
|
||||||
|
Revenues
|
$ |
0
|
$ |
0
|
$ |
0
|
% |
0
|
|||||
|
Operating
expenses
|
13,147,485
|
2,691,516
|
10,455,969
|
388
|
|||||||||
|
Other
income (expense) - net
|
(197,050
|
)
|
0
|
197,050
|
-
|
||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
13,344,535
|
2,691,516
|
10,653,019
|
396
|
|||||||||
| Loss per common share | $ |
.12
|
$ | .05 | $ |
.07
|
% |
140
|
|||||
Revenues
We
did
not generate any revenue during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 and we
do
not anticipate generating any revenue in the next 12 months from our present
business segment or from the new business segment that we will aquire when
we
close the merger with Thorium Power.
Operating
Expenses
Cash
used for operating expenses totaled approximately
$1,246,000, with the remaining amount attributable to expenses paid for by
equity issuances.
Operating
expenses increased $10,455,969
due primarily to:
|
·
|
Payroll
expenses and related fringe benefits increased $116,436 due to the
hiring
of additional key management. We increased our payroll and related
fringe
benefits costs in our first fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006,
as we
have hired an additional 6 employees.
|
|
·
|
Professional
fees expense increased
approximately
$672,000
due primarily to legal fees incurred in connection with the upcoming
merger with Thorium Power, Inc and financing activities. We anticipate
that our legal fees will decrease once we are able to complete the
merger
with Thorium Power Inc., unless we engage in other financing or
acquisition activities.
|
|
·
|
Travel,
business development, and public relations expense increased $93,385.
We
anticipate that our travel, business development and public relations
expense will increase as we continue to promote our business and
seek
other opportunities in the nuclear
industry.
|
|
·
|
Consulting
expense increased $3,466,600,
which included costs associated with finance, geological
work,
government advocacy
work,
technical advisory
board,
and international advisory
board.
|
|
·
|
Stock
Based Compensation was $4,949,729, which included stock and stock
option
grants to our executive officers and advisory board members. Our
implementation of SFAS No. 123R (a modification to the existing standard
-
SFAS No. 123) in 2006 (see notes to the financial statements), changed
the
way we account for Stock-Based Compensation in 2006, and required
us to
record expenses for equity instruments for which we would not have
been
required to report under SFAS No.
123.
|
|
·
|
We
incurred a net impairment loss of $670,544 on the mineral property
acquisition costs, as we wrote off the entire amounts expended to
acquire
the rights to mine properties in Alabama and Australia. This
impairment was based on management's assessment of future projected
undiscounted and discounted cash flows from the
properties.
|
|
·
|
Mineral
exploration costs increased $394,516 due to our exploration activities
in
our mining operations.
|
|
·
|
Director
and officer liability insurance expense increased $91,506 due to
liability
insurance related to the merger
agreement
|
Other
income (expense)
Changes
in Fair Value of Warrants:
|
·
|
We
recorded a warrant liability in the amount of $3,678,278 for the
fair
value of warrants accruing under a Registration Rights Agreement
entered
into on May 4, 2006 (see Item 7 of Part II, “Financial Statements—Note
9(ii) —Share Capital”). The change in the fair value of the warrants, from
May 4, 2006 to June 30, 2006 was a loss recorded of
$139,220.
|
14
Interest
and Dividend income increased $80,571 for the year ended June 30, 2006. This
increase is due to the increase in our cash balances, due to the 3 private
placements that we completed during our fiscal year.
Legal
Settlement expense increased $146,445
due the settlement of one lawsuit.
Research
and Development Activities
In
the
next 12-24 months we expect in incur Research and Development expenses related
to Thorium Power Inc,’s development of its patents for its proprietary nuclear
fuel design.
Cash
Flows - Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Cash
Flows
We
used
$1,246,314 in cash from our operating activities during the year ended June
30,
2006 as compared to $7,079 used in the prior year. The difference of $1,239,235
which is attributable to the following factors:
|
·
|
Increased
overhead expenses attributable to the addition of key management
and
staff.
|
|
·
|
Payroll
expenses and related fringe benefits increased $116,436 due to the
hiring
of additional key management and staff. We increased our payroll
and
related fringe benefits costs in our first fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2006, as we have hired an additional 6 employees.
|
|
·
|
Professional
fees expense increased $672,000
due primarily to legal fees incurred in connection with the upcoming
merger with Thorium Power, Inc and financing activities. We anticipate
that our legal fees will decrease once we are able to complete the
merger
with Thorium Power Inc., unless we engage in other financing or
acquisition activities.
|
|
·
|
Travel,
business development, and public relations expense increased $93,385.
We anticipate that our travel, business development and public relations
expense will increase as we continue to promote our business and
seek
other opportunities in the Nuclear
Industry.
|
|
·
|
Other
general and administrative expenses increased $358,000 which consisted
primarily of insurance expense, other office expenses which were
offset by
a payable due to Thorium Power Inc.
|
We
used
$1,350,000 in cash from our investing activities during the year ended June
30,
2006 as compared to $0 used in the prior year. This increase is due to our
investment in Thorium Power Inc.
(see
Item 7 of Part II, “Financial Statements—Note 5 —Investment/Due to Thorium Power
Inc.”)
We
received $17,026,919 from financing activities during the year ended June 30,
2006 as compared to $7,881 during the prior year. This increase is due primarily
to an increase in sales of our securities through private
placements. (see
Item 7 of Part II, “Financial Statements—Note 9(i) (g), Note 9(i) (t) and Note 9
(ii)—Share Capital”)
For
further information on the cumulative cash flows from June
28,
1999
(Inception) to June 30, 2006
see Item
7 of Part II, “Financial Statements”, Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows”.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
June
30, 2006, our total assets were $16,589,832. Liabilities as of June 30, 2006
totaled $5,273,588. We had working capital surplus of $9,966,244
at June
30, 2006.
On
May 4,
2006, we closed a $15,000,000 private placement (raised $15,580,431) for the
purpose of acquiring, exploring and developing Thorium and rare earth minerals
properties as well as to assist us in connection with the planned acquisition
of
Thorium Power and the development of Thorium Power’s business.
15
While
management expects these proceeds will meet our foreseeable needs for at least
the next 12 months, we may need to raise additional capital by way of an
offering of equity securities, an offering of debt securities, or by obtaining
financing through a bank or other entity. If we need to obtain additional
financing, that financing may not be available or we may not be able to obtain
that financing on terms acceptable to us. If additional funds are raised through
the issuance of equity securities, there may be a significant dilution in the
value of our outstanding common stock.
Major
cash commitments in the next fiscal year are related to the funding of Thorium
Power’s business, corporate administration and operations, and proposed
exploration activities.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We
do not
have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely
to
have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital
expenditures or capital resources that is material to an investor in our
securities.
Seasonality
Our
business has not been subject to any material seasonal variations in operations,
although this may change in the future.
Inflation
As
a
development stage company, our business, revenues and operating results have
not
been affected in any material way by inflation. If and when it begins marketing
thorium and other minerals, management expects its business will be affected
by
inflation and commodity price volatility.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Securities and Exchange Commission issued Financial Reporting Release No. 60,
"Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies"
suggesting that companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on their
most critical accounting policies. In Financial Reporting Release No. 60, the
Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting
policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company's
financial condition and operating results, and require management to make its
most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make
estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition,
we
have identified the following significant policies as critical to the
understanding of its financial statements.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make a variety of estimates and
assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial
statements and (ii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods covered by the financial statements.
Our
management expects to make judgments and estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions
affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments
become even more subjective and complex. Although we believe that our estimates
and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ significantly from
these estimates. Changes in estimates and assumptions based upon actual results
may have a material impact on our results of operation and/or financial
condition. We have identified certain accounting policies that we believe are
most important to the portrayal of our current financial condition and results
of operations. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.
16
Mineral
Property Exploration and Acquisition Costs
Costs
of acquiring property
concessions and exploration costs will be capitalized by project area when
a
production decision is made in respect to the project and we are reasonably
assured that it will receive regulatory approval to permit mining operations.
Costs to maintain the property concessions and leases are expensed as incurred.
When a property concession reaches the production stage, the related capitalized
costs will be amortized, using the units of production method on the basis
of
periodic estimates of ore reserves. To date no property concessions have reached
production stage.
Property
concessions will be periodically assessed for impairment of value and any
diminution in value is charged to operations at the time of impairment. Should
a
property concession be abandoned, its capitalized costs will be charged to
operations. Our charges to operations the allocable portion of capitalized
costs
attributable to property concessions sold. Capitalized costs will be allocated
to property concessions abandoned or sold based on the proportion of claims
abandoned or sold to the claims remaining within the project area.
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities
We
will
recognize the expected future tax benefit from deferred tax assets when the
tax
benefit is considered to be more likely than not of being realized. Assessing
the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires management to make
significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income.
Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows and the
application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future
cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, our ability
to realize deferred tax assets could be impacted. Additionally, future changes
in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate could limit our ability
to
obtain the future tax benefits.
Property
and equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the
straight-line or accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. The useful lives of property, plant and equipment for purposes of
computing depreciation are five to seven years for equipment, and 39 years
for
buildings.
We
evaluate the recoverability of property and equipment when events and
circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. We determine
impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be
generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance
and
repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments are capitalized.
The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the
accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of
operations.
Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation, Stock Options and Warrants Granted to Employees
and Nonemployees
We
currently report stock issued to employees under the rules of SFAS No.
123R.
The
options were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used were as follows: volatility of 279% to 284%, a risk-free
interest rate of 4.30% to 4.35% and an exercise term of five years.
Environmental
Matters
When
it
is probable that costs associated with environmental remediation obligations
will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable, we will accrue such costs
at
the most likely estimate. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental
remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of
the
remedial feasibility study for such facility and are charged to provisions
for
closed operations and environmental matters. We periodically review our accrued
liabilities for such remediation costs as evidence becomes available indicating
that its remediation liability has potentially changed. Costs of future
expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present
value unless subject to a contractually obligated fixed payment schedule. Such
costs are based on our current estimate of amounts that are expected to be
incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and
regulations. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties
will be recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable.
17
Future
remediation costs for inactive mines will be accrued based on management’s best
estimate at the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be
incurred. Such costs estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care,
maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates are reflected in earnings
in the period an estimate is revised.
Accounting
for reclamation and remediation obligations requires management to make
estimates unique to each mining operation of the future costs we will incur
to
complete the reclamation and remediation work required to comply with existing
laws and regulations. Actual costs incurred in future periods could differ
from
amounts estimated. Additionally, future changes to environmental laws and
regulations could increase the extent of reclamation and remediation work
required. Any such increases in future costs could materially impact the amounts
charged to earnings. At March 31, 2005 and the years ended June 30,2006 and
2005, we had no accrual for reclamation and remediation obligations because
management cannot make a reasonable estimate. Any reclamation or remediation
costs related to abandoned concessions has been previously
expensed.
See
the
index to our financial statements and our financial statements following the
Signature Page and Certifications at the end of this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.
There
have been no disagreements regarding accounting and financial disclosure matters
with our independent certified public accountants.
As
required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation
of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-KSB.
This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including Seth Grae, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Larry Goldman, our acting Chief Financial Officer. Based upon
that
evaluation, management concluded that the our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to management (including the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to give reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in
connection with the evaluation performed that occurred during the fiscal year
covered by this report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely
to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
our
reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive and acting Chief Financial
Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
18
Directors
and Executive Officers
Set
forth
below are the names of our current directors, officers and significant
employees, their ages, all positions and offices that they hold with us, the
period during which they have served as such, and their business experience
during at least the last five years.
SETH
GRAE.
Mr.
Grae, age 43, was named the Chief Executive Officer and President of Novastar
on
March 17, 2006, and effective April 2, 2006, became a director of
Novastar.
Mr.
Grae
is the President, the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Thorium Power.
Mr. Grae has played an active role in all business activities of Thorium Power
since its inception in 1992. Mr. Grae led the efforts that resulted in Thorium
Power’s project at the Kurchatov Institute becoming one of the first grant
recipients from the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”) for nuclear
non-proliferation-related work in Russia. He is a member of the board of
directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and has served as co-chair
of
the American Bar Association’s Committee on Arms Control and Disarmament. As a
former member of the board of directors of the Lawyers Alliance for World
Security, Mr. Grae helped advise on the drafting of nuclear export control
regulations in China and Belarus, and he participated in consultations with
the
government of India on nuclear power and weapons. On a pro bono basis, he
represented refuseniks, who were nuclear scientists, in securing exit visas
from
the Soviet Union. Mr. Grae obtained his B.A. from Brandeis University cum laude,
J.D. from American University, LL.M. in International Law with honors from
Georgetown University and M.B.A. from Georgetown University. He has been
admitted to the bars of New York, Connecticut, and Florida (all now
inactive).
THOMAS
GRAHAM, JR. Ambassador
Graham, age 72, became a director of Novastar on April 2, 2006, and chairman
of
the board of directors on April 4, 2006.
Ambassador
Graham is one of the world’s leading experts in nuclear non-proliferation. He is
Chairman of the Board of the Cypress Fund for Peace and Security. Ambassador
Graham has served as a senior U.S. diplomat involved in the negotiation of
every
major international arms control and non-proliferation agreement for the past
35
years, including the Strategic Arms Limitations Talks (SALT), Strategic Arms
Reduction Talks (START Treaties), Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty,
Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT), Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty and Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty (CTBT). In 1993, Ambassador Graham served as the Acting Director
of
the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), and for seven months in
1994 served as the Acting Deputy Director. From 1994 through 1997, he served
as
the Special Representative of the President of the United States for Arms
Control, Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, and in this capacity successfully
led U.S. government efforts to achieve the permanent extension of the NPT.
He
also served for 15 years as the general counsel of ACDA. Ambassador Graham
worked on the negotiation of the Chemical Weapon Convention and the Biological
Weapons Convention. He drafted the implementing legislation for the Biological
Weapons Convention and managed the Senate approval of the ratification of the
Geneva Protocol banning the use in war of chemical and biological weapons.
He is
also Chairman of the Board of Mexco Energy Corporation, an oil and gas
exploration company listed on the American Stock Exchange (stock ticker symbol
MXC). Ambassador
Graham
received an A.B. in 1955 from Princeton and a J.D. in 1961 from Harvard
University. He is a member of the Kentucky, the District of Columbia and the
New
York Bars and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He chaired the
Committee on Arms Control and Disarmament of the American Bar Association from
1986-1994. Ambassador
Graham
received the Trainor Award for Distinction in Diplomacy from Georgetown
University in 1995.
CORNELIUS
J. MILMOE.
Mr.
Milmoe, age 59, became a director of Novastar on April 2, 2006 and he was
appointed the Chief Operating Officer of Novastar on April 4, 2006.
Mr.
Milmoe served as General Counsel for General Electric’s nuclear fuel business
that provided nuclear fuel fabrication, software and design services to 50
nuclear reactors in the U.S., Europe, Japan, Mexico and Taiwan. At GE Nuclear
Fuel, Mr. Milmoe led legal negotiations for all reactor reload contracts (valued
at $30 to $300 million each), created a joint venture with Hitachi and Toshiba
to build a $70 million modern fuel processing plant that reduced costs by 30%
and environmental effluents by 90%, and created a marketing joint venture with
ENUSA that led to GE Nuclear Fuel’s first fuel sales at plants in Germany and
Finland. Since leaving GE in 2000, Mr. Milmoe has run his own consulting firm
that has included GE as a major client, focusing on international energy
transactions. Mr. Milmoe formed a project team to recover low enriched uranium
for fuel fabrication from uranium concentrates at the Ulba Metallurgical plant
in Kazakhstan. The DOE-supported project team included GE, Brookhaven National
Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kazatomprom and RWE Nukem.
Mr. Milmoe’s other projects include construction of a copper-beryllium
alloy processing plant in Kazakhstan, sourcing zirconium components in Russia
for Western nuclear power plants and R&D agreements for advanced nuclear
technologies. Mr. Milmoe’s firm has also received contracts to improve DOE
reporting and management of all projects relating to the implementation of
President Bush’s National Energy Policy and DOE’s international energy
agreements, particularly science and technology agreements and nuclear
non-proliferation agreements. Mr. Milmoe earned his B.A. from Colgate University
in 1969 and earned his J.D. from Columbia University Law School and was admitted
to the bar in 1974. From 1974 to 1980, Mr. Milmoe served as Staff Attorney
and
Special Assistant to the New York Public Service Commission. From 1980 to 1994,
Mr. Milmoe served as a counsel in the following divisions of General Electric:
GE Naval & Small Steam Turbines, GE Aircraft Engines, GE Government
Services, GE Automated Systems, GE Aircraft Instruments, GE Armament Systems
and
GE Silicones.
19
VICTOR
E. ALESSI.
Dr.
Alessi, age 66, became a director of Novastar on August 23, 2006.
Dr.
Victor E. Alessi is President Emeritus of the United States Industry Coalition
(“USIC”), an organization dedicated to facilitating the commercialization of
technologies of the New Independent States (“NIS”) of the former Soviet Union
through cooperation with its members. He has held such position since August
1,
2006; prior to becoming President Emeritus, Dr. Alessi held the positions of
CEO
and President of USIC since 1999. Previously, he was President of DynMeridian,
a
subsidiary of DynCorp, specializing in arms control, nonproliferation, and
international security affairs. Before joining DynMeridian in early 1996, Dr.
Alessi was the Executive Assistant to the Director, U.S. Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency (“ACDA”). At ACDA he resolved inter-bureau disputes, and
advised the Director on all arms control and nonproliferation issues. Dr. Alessi
served as Director of the Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation in the
Department of Energy (“DOE”) prior to his work at ACDA, overseeing all DOE arms
control and nonproliferation activities. As a senior DOE representative, Dr.
Alessi participated in U.S. efforts that led to successful conclusion of the
Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF), Conventional Forces in Europe, Threshold
Test
Ban, Peaceful Nuclear Explosions, Open Skies, Strategic Arms Reductions Talks
Treaties and the Chemical Weapons Convention. In this role, he was instrumental
in implementing the U.S. unilateral nuclear initiative in 1991 and was a member
of the U.S. delegation discussing nuclear disarmament with Russia and other
states of the former Soviet Union. He was in charge of DOE’s support to the U.N.
Special Commission on Iraq, to the Nunn-Lugar Initiative, and represented DOE
in
discussions on the Comprehensive Test Ban (“CTB”) with the other nuclear weapons
states before the CTB negotiations began in Geneva in 1994. Dr. Alessi has
been
the U.S. board member to the International Science and Technology Center in
Moscow since its founding. He is also the U.S. board member to the Science
and
Technology Center in Ukraine. Dr. Alessi is a 1963 graduate of Fordham
University, where he also earned a licentiate in Philosophy (Ph.L.) in 1964.
He
studied nuclear physics at Georgetown University, receiving his M.S. in 1968
and
Ph.D. in 1969.
LARRY
GOLDMAN. Mr.
Goldman, age 50, became the Treasurer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Novastar on June 13, 2006.
Mr.
Goldman is a certified public accountant with over 20 years of auditing,
consulting and technical experience as a partner in a mid-size New York City
based accounting firm, working with a wide variety of companies, assisting
them
in streamlining their operations and increasing profitability. Prior to joining
Novastar, Mr. Goldman worked as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Vice
President of Finance of WinWin Gaming, Inc. (OTCBB: WNWN),
a
multi-media
developer and publisher of sports, lottery and other games.
Prior
to
joining WinWin, in
October 2004, Mr. Goldman was a partner at Livingston Wachtell & Co., LLP
and had been with that firm for the past 19 years.
Mr. Goldman is also an independent director and audit committee chairman of
Winner Medical Group Inc. (OTCBB: WMDG.OB), a China based manufacturer of
medical disposable products and surgical dressings. Mr. Goldman has extensive
experience in both auditing and consulting with public companies, and has
experience providing accounting and consulting services to the Asian
marketplace, having audited several Chinese public companies.
20
ANDREY
MUSHAKOV.
Mr.
Mushakov, age 29,
became
the Executive Vice President - International Nuclear Operations of Novastar
on
July 27, 2006.
Mr.
Mushakov is Treasurer and Secretary of Thorium Power and has held these
positions since April 2002 and July 2003 respectively. He is the primary liaison
between Thorium Power and the Kurchatov Institute in Moscow. Mr. Mushakov has
expertise in financial analysis, financial planning and budgeting, financial
reporting and accounting, structuring business transactions, and government
contract negotiations. In 2004, Mr. Mushakov led successful negotiations with
officials from the National Nuclear Security Administration and Oak Ridge
National Laboratory (ORNL) that resulted in signing of a $3.5 million government
contract between ORNL and Kurchatov Institute for work relating to the Thorium
Power's nuclear fuel development effort in Russia. His prior experience includes
finance-related work in the banking and construction sectors. Mr. Mushakov
has
the following degrees: PhD in Economics from St. Petersburg State University
of
Economics and Finance (Russia), MS in Management with excellence (MBA
equivalent) from Hult International Business School (formerly the Arthur D.
Little School of Management), where he was enrolled as a recipient of the
Russian President's Scholarship, and BS in Banking and Finance with honors
from
the Finance Academy of Russia.
There
are
no agreements or understandings for any of our executive officers or directors
to resign at the request of another person and no officer or director is acting
on behalf of nor will any of them act at the direction of any other
person.
Directors
are elected until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
To
the
best of our knowledge, except as set forth herein, none of our directors,
director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions
with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates
which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the
SEC. None of the directors, director designees or executive officers to our
knowledge has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic
violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or
administrative proceeding during the past five years that resulted in a
judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations
of,
or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or
a
finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters
that were dismissed without sanction or settlement.
Committees
and Board Meetings
We
do not
have a standing audit, nominating or compensation committee or any committee
performing a similar function although we intend to form such committees in
the
near future.
Audit
Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
We
do not
currently have an audit committee financial expert, nor do we have an audit
committee. Our entire board of directors, which currently consists of Mr. Grae,
Amb. Graham, Mr. Milmoe and Mr. Alessi, handles the functions that would
otherwise be handled by an audit committee. We are currently looking to add
an
additional director to the board of directors to serve in the capacity of an
audit committee financial expert, though no agreement has been reached with
any
possible candidate. Additionally, prior to retaining any such expert, our board
would make a determination as to whether such person is
independent.
Director
Compensation
We
currently have only one independent director, Vic Alessi. Mr. Alessi became
a
director of the Company on August 21, 2006. Pursuant to the Independent Director
Contract between Mr. Alessi and the Company, Mr. Alessi receives $40,000 in
cash
per year for acting as a director of Novastar. In addition, Mr. Alessi was
granted non-qualified options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the common
stock of the Company which shall vest with respect to 1/36 of the total number
of shares on September 21, 2006; the remaining shares will
subsequently vest 1/36 on the first day of each month thereafter until all
options have vested
Except
for Mr. Alessi, all of our current directors are also our officers and are
compensated for the services that they provide to us in their capacity as
officers. Other than Mr. Alessi, our current directors do not receive any
additional compensation for the services they provide to us as directors.
Directors are reimbursed for out of pocket expenses incurred as a result of
their participation on our board.
21
We
intend
to compensate independent directors that are elected or appointed to our board
in the future in a manner that is consistent with Mr. Alessi’s compensation as
described above.
Family
Relationships
There
are
no family relationships among our directors or officers.
Code
of Ethics
Effective
October 13, 2004, our Company's Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our company's President
and Secretary (being our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer), as well as persons performing similar
functions. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth
written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to
promote:
1.
honest
and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent
conflicts of interest between personal and professional
relationships;
2.
full,
fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents
that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and
in
other public communications made by us;
3.
compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and
regulations;
4.
the
prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics; and
5.
accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics.
Our
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our
company's Senior Officers commit to timely, accurate and consistent disclosure
of information; that they maintain confidential information; and that they
act
with honesty and integrity.
In
addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees,
and particularly Senior Officers, have a responsibility for maintaining
financial integrity within our company, consistent with generally accepted
accounting principles, and federal and state securities laws. Any Senior Officer
who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting
manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or
being told of it, must report it to our company. Any failure to report such
inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe
disciplinary matter. It is against our company policy to retaliate against
any
individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of
our
company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.
Our
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 14.1 to our annual report
on
Form 10-KSB file with the Commission on November 25, 2005. We will provide
a
copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge,
upon request. Requests can be sent to: Novastar Resources Ltd., 8300 Greensboro
Drive, Suite 800 McLean, Virginia 22102.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act, as amended, requires our executive officers,
directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our shares of common
stock to file reports of their beneficial ownership and changes in ownership
(Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendment thereto) with the SEC. Executive officers,
directors, and greater-than-ten percent holders are required to furnish us
with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
22
Based
solely upon a review of the Forms 3, 4, and 5 furnished to us for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2006, we have determined that our directors, officers,
and
greater than 10% beneficial owners, except as provided below, complied with
all
applicable Section 16 filing requirements.
Thomas
Graham, Jr. was late in filing a Form 3 and a transaction on Form 4. Sean
Mulhearn was late in filing a Form 3. Chris Davis was late in filing a Form
3.
Cornelius J. Milmoe was late in filing a Form 3. Charles Merchant was late
in
filing a Form 3 and a transaction on Form 4.
The
following table sets forth information concerning all cash and non-cash
compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officers,
for
services during the last three fiscal years in all capacities to us, our
subsidiaries and predecessors. No executive officer received compensation of
$100,000 or more in any of the last three fiscal years.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
LONG
TERM COMPENSATION
|
||||||||
|
ANNUAL
COMPENSATION
|
AWARDS
|
PAYOUTS
|
||||||
|
Name
And
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary(1)
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Other
Annual
Compensation
($)
(4)
|
Restricted
Stock
Award(s)
($)
|
Securities
Under-Lying
Options/SARs (#)
|
LTIP
Payouts ($)
|
All
Other Compensation
($)
|
|
Paul
Carter (1)
Chief
Executive Officer, President, Chairman and Director
|
2006
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
2005
|
$0
|
$0
|
$40,000
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
2004
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
Charles
H. Merchant (2)
Interim
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
|
2006
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$127,500
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
2005
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
2004
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
Seth
Grae (3)
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
|
2006
|
$29,762
|
$0
|
$0
|
$4,150,000
|
$647,133
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
2005
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
2004
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
23
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Carter served as Novastar’s Chief Executive Officer from 2002 until
December 1, 2005.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Merchant served as Novastar’s interim Chief Executive Officer from
December 1, 2005 until March 17,
2006.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Grae was named the Chief Executive Officer and President of Novastar
on
March 17, 2006, and effective April 2, 2006, became a director of
Novastar.
|
|
(4)
|
The
value of perquisites and other personal benefits, securities and
property
for the named executive officers that do not exceed the lesser of
$1,000
or 10% of the total of the annual salary and bonus is not reported
herein.
|
Bonuses
and Deferred Compensation
Novastar
has no retirement, pension or profit sharing program for the benefit of its
directors, officers or other employees, but the board of directors may recommend
one or more such programs for adoption in the future.
Options
and Stock Appreciation Rights
OPTION
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying Options Granted
(1)
|
%
of Total Options Granted To Employees in the
Fiscal Year
|
Exercise
Price
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Paul
Carter
|
0
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles
H. Merchant
|
0
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seth
Grae
|
7,200,000
|
69%
|
$0.80
|
February
14, 2016
|
24
AGGREGATED
NOVASTAR OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR-END
AND
FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES TABLE
The
following table contains information concerning the number of shares acquired
and value realized from the exercise of options by the named executive officers
during fiscal 2006 and the number of unexercised options held by the named
executive officers at June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
Number
of Shares of Common Stock Underlying Unexercised Options
at Year End June 30, 2006
|
Value
of Unexpected In-The-Money Options at
Year
End June 30, 2006 (1)
|
||
|
Name
|
Shares
Acquired on Exercise
|
Value
Realized ($)
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Paul
Carter
|
0
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles
H. Merchant
|
0
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seth
Grae
|
0
|
N/A
|
1,650,000
|
5,550,000
|
$0
|
$0
|
____________________
(1) Options
are "in-the-money" if the market price of a share of common stock exceeds the
exercise price of the option.
OPTION/SAR
GRANTS
Effective
February 14, 2006, Novastar adopted its 2006 Stock Plan. The 2006 Stock Plan
provides for grants of restricted shares of common stock and grants of stock
options. Under the terms of the 2006 Stock Plan, as amended on July 17, 2006,
Novastar Resources may grant a maximum of 75 million shares of common stock,
to
consist of no more than 75 million shares issuable under incentive stock options
and no more than 37.5 million restricted shares of common stock. The maximum
number of restricted shares that may be granted to one individual in any fiscal
year is five million shares, and the maximum number of options that may be
granted to one individual in any fiscal year is eight million shares. Since
adopting the 2006 Stock Plan, Novastar has granted to date a total of 19,225,000
options to its officers, directors and advisory board members.
Prior
to
the 2006 Stock Plan, the Novastar board of directors chose to make option or
warrant awards to select officers, directors, consultants, or
stockholder/investors in order to induce them to assist it in implementing
its
business model and to provide long term additional incentive. These options
or
warrants, as awarded, were not awarded pursuant to a plan but were specific
individual awards with varying terms and conditions. In some instances, the
board of directors reserved the right to cancel these awards for non-performance
or other reasons, or established a vesting schedule pursuant to which the award
is earned.
Employment
Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control
Arrangements
On
February 14, 2006, Novastar and Seth Grae entered into an employment agreement
whereby Mr. Grae became Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, Novastar has agreed to pay Mr. Grae an
annual salary of $275,000 for performing the duties described in the employment
agreement. In addition, Novastar issued to Mr. Grae pursuant to the agreement
5,000,000 shares of restricted stock and granted to Mr. Grae 7,200,000
non-qualified stock options, with a term of ten years at an exercise price
of
$0.795 per share. The options vest with respect to 6/48 of the total number
of
shares granted on August 14, 2006 and vest 1/48 on the first day of each month
thereafter until all options have vested. The 5,000,000 shares of restricted
stock vest immediately on issuance but 2,500,000 may not be directly or
indirectly sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of for a period of one year
and the remaining 2,500,000 for a period of two years, except for sales,
transfers or other dispositions made to family members, for estate planning
purposes, or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order. The shares will
also be subject to the provisions of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities
Act. Mr. Grae was named CEO of Novastar on March 17, 2006, though the agreement
did not take effect until April 2, 2006, the date that Novastar obtained D&O
liability insurance coverage, and the agreement terminates on April 2, 2011
the
fifth anniversary of the date of the agreement.
On June 5, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive employment agreement
with
Cornelius J. Milmoe, the Chief Operating Officer and a
Director of the Company. Under the terms of the agreement,
the
Company agreed to pay Mr. Milmoe an annual salary of $200,000, as consideration
for performance of his duties as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Milmoe was
paid an
amount equal to a 75% pro rata share of his annual salary, as consideration
for
services already performed by him on behalf of the Company from April 3,
2006
through May 1, 2006. In addition, the Company has agreed (i) to issue to
Mr.
Milmoe, 75,000 (37,500 restricted) shares of the common stock the Company
and
(ii) to grant to Mr. Milmoe an incentive ten-year option for the purchase
of
525,000 shares of the common stock the Company, at an exercise price of $0.465
per share. The initial
term of
the Mr. Milmoe’s employment agreement will be one year and but will
automatically be extended for
additional one-year periods unless terminated by either party in accordance
with
its terms and conditions.
Pursuant
to a consulting agreement dated June 13, 2006, Larry Goldman became Novastar's
Treasurer and Acting Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Goldman owns a total of
75,000
restricted shares of Novastar Common Stock, which were issued upon entry
into
the consulting agreement
with Mr.
Goldman. Mr.
Goldman
receives hourly compensation of $170.00 for services provided to Novastar,
subject to a maximum of ten hours per day. The contract includes payment
for a
minimum of 40 hours per month. The contract can be terminated by Novastar
at any
time, but Novastar must provide at least 180 days advance written notice.
Pursuant to the consulting agreement, Mr. Goldman was granted nonqualified
options for the purchase of an additional 350,000 shares of Novastar common
stock pursuant to Novastar's 2006 stock plan. Upon consummation of the merger,
Mr. Goldman will own a total of 75,000 shares of Novastar common stock and
options to purchase a total of 350,000 shares of Novastar common
stock.
25
On
July
27, 2006, Ambassador Graham entered into an employment and stock option
agreement with Novastar. Under the employment
agreement, Ambassador Graham acts as the Chairman and Secretary of
Novastar. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Novastar has agreed to pay
Ambassador Graham an annual salary of $130,000 for part-time employment of
an
average of three out of five business days per week or 24 hours of his business
time per week. In addition, Novastar granted to Ambassador Graham non-qualified
stock options for the purchase of 1,500,000 shares, with a term of ten years
at
an exercise price of $0.49 per share. The options vest in equal monthly
installments over a three year period. Ambassador Graham owns a total of
40,025
shares of Thorium Power common stock and options to purchase 100,000 shares
of
Thorium Power common stock at an exercise price of $10 per share. Ambassador
Graham owns 190,000 shares of Novastar common stock. Upon consummation of
the
merger, Ambassador Graham will own a total of 1,215,761 shares of Novastar
common stock and he will own options to purchase 4,062,800 shares of Novastar
common stock.
On
July
27, 2006, Mr. Mushakov entered into an employment and stock option agreement
with Novastar. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Mushakov was appointed
as the
Executive Vice President - International Nuclear Operations. Pursuant to
the
employment agreement, Novastar has agreed to pay Mr. Mushakov an annual salary
of $160,000 for performing the duties described in the agreement. In addition,
Novastar issued to Mr. Mushakov, pursuant to the agreement, 1,500,000 shares
of
restricted stock and granted Mr. Mushakov 2,250,000 non-qualified stock options
with a term of ten years at an exercise price of $0.49 per share. On July
27,
2006, 234,375 options vested and the remaining 2,015,625 options will vest
in
equal monthly installments. The 1,500,000 shares of restricted stock vest
immediately on issuance, but 750,000 may not be directly or indirectly sold,
transferred or otherwise disposed of for a period of one year and the remaining
750,000 for a period of two years, except for sales, transfers or other
dispositions made to family members for estate planning purposes or pursuant
to
a qualified domestic relations order. Mr. Mushakov owns options to purchase
a
total of 37,500 shares of Thorium Power common stock. Upon consummation of
the
merger, Mr. Mushakov will own 1,500,000 shares of Novastar common stock and
3,211,050 options to purchase shares of Novastar common
stock.
The
following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of August 1, 2006 by:
|
o
|
each
security holder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than
5% of
our outstanding common stock;
|
|
o
|
each
current director;
|
|
o
|
each
of our named executive officers listed in the table under the caption
“Executive Compensation” and
|
|
o
|
all
current directors and executive officers as a
group.
|
Unless
otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is
in
care of Novastar Resources Ltd., 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 800, McLean,
VA
22102.
|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Amount
and Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(1
|
Percent
of
Common
Stock(2)
|
|
Seth
Grae
|
7,050,000
|
4.5%
|
|
Andrey
Mushakov
|
1,828,125
|
1.2%
|
|
Thomas
Graham, Jr.
|
273,333
|
*
|
|
Cornelius
J. Milmoe
|
75,000
|
*
|
|
Larry
Goldman
|
75,000
|
*
|
|
OTC
Investments Ltd.
1710-1177
West Hastings Street
Vancouver,
BC V6E 2L3 Canada
|
15,000,000
|
9.6%
|
|
Directors
and Officers as a Group (five people)
|
9,301,458
|
5.9%
|
____________________
* Less
than
1%
(1) Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally
includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Each of the
beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power
and
investment power with respect to the shares of Novastar common
stock.
(2) A
total
of 156,411,474 shares of Novastar common stock are considered to be outstanding
pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For
each
beneficial owner above, any options exercisable within 60 days have been
included in the denominator.
On
December 1, 2005, the Company granted Chris Davis, the President of OTC
Investments Ltd, which holds 9.6% of the outstanding shares of common stock
of
the Company, 2,000,000 shares of its common stock as compensation for certain
consulting services. The fair market value of the shares on the date on which
they were granted to Mr. Davis was $0.17 per share, for a total value of
$340,000.
See Item
7 of Part II, “Financial Statements—Notes 7(i)(b) and 7(i)(c) for information
relating to transactions entered into with our prior Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Merchant.
26
The
following exhibits are filed with this report, except those indicated as having
previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are
incorporated by reference to another report, registration statement or form.
As
to any shareholder of record requesting a copy of this report, we will furnish
any exhibit indicated in the list below as filed with this report upon payment
to us of our expenses in furnishing the information.
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB filed on December 17, 1999).
|
|
3.2
|
By-laws
(incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on September 18, 2006).
|
|
4.1
|
2005
Compensation Plan for Outside Consultants of Custom Brand Networks,
Inc.
dated March 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 10,
2005).
|
|
4.2
|
2005
Augmented Compensation Plan for Outside Consultants of Novastar Resources
Ltd. dated August 15, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 19,
2005).
|
|
4.3
|
2006
Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current
report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed February 21, 2006)
|
|
10.1
|
Consulting
Agreement dated October 15, 2004 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Walter Doyle (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 19, 2004).
|
|
10.2
|
Consulting
Agreement dated October 15, 2004 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Adam Harrison (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 19, 2004).
|
|
10.3
|
Consulting
Agreement dated October 15, 2004 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Tim Lelek (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 19,
2004).
|
27
|
10.4
|
Consulting
Agreement dated October 15, 2004 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Bruce Fearn (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 19, 2004).
|
|
10.5
|
Compensation
Agreement dated October 15, 2004 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Paul G. Carter (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 19, 2004).
|
|
10.6
|
Consulting
Agreement dated January 24, 2005 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Walter Doyle (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on January 27, 2005).
|
|
10.7
|
Consulting
Agreement dated January 24, 2005 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Sanjeev Pamnani (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on January 27, 2005).
|
|
10.8
|
Consulting
Agreement dated January 24, 2005 between Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. and
Seth Shaw (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on January 27, 2005).
|
|
10.9
|
Assignment
of Specific Mineral Rights dated September 14, 2005 between American
Graphite Holdings and Novastar Resources Ltd. (incorporated by reference
from Novastar’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 11,
2005).
|
|
10.10
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated March 5, 2006, to Assignment of Specific Mineral Rights
between American Graphite Holdings and Novastar Resources Ltd.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 of the initial filing
of
this Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed June 14,
2006).
|
|
10.11
|
Mining
Acquisition Agreement dated September 30, 2005 between Walter Doyle
and
Novastar Resources Ltd. (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 11, 2005).
|
|
10.12
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated March 5, 2006, to Mining Acquisition Agreement between
Walter
Doyle and Novastar Resources Ltd. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit
10.12 of the initial filing of this Registration Statement on Form
S-4
filed June 14, 2006).
|
|
10.13
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated as of February 14, 2006, between Novastar
Resources Ltd., TP Acquisition Corp. and Thorium Power Inc. (incorporated
by reference from Novastar’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13,
2006).
|
|
10.14
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated June 9, 2006, to Agreement and Plan of Merger between
Novastar Resources Ltd., TP Acquisition Corp. and Thorium Power Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current report
of
Novastar on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2006).
|
|
10.15
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006, between Novastar and Seth
Grae
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the current report
of
Novastar on Form 8-K filed February 21, 2006)
|
|
10.16
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006, between Novastar
and Seth
Grae (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the current report
of
Novastar on Form 8-K filed February 21, 2006)
|
|
10.17
|
Subscription
Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006, between Novastar and Thorium
Power (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the current report
of
Novastar on Form 8-K filed February 21, 2006)
|
|
10.18
|
Amended
and Restated Consulting Agreement, dated February 6, 2006, between
Novastar and Alan Gelband (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
of
the current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed February 21,
2006)
|
28
|
10.19
|
Form
of Subscription Agreement between Novastar and the investors in the
private placement closed on February 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.6 of the current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed
February 21, 2006)
|
|
10.20
|
Assignment
of Minerals Lease, dated December 31, 2005, between CM Properties
and
Novastar Resources Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed January 10,
2006)
|
|
10.21
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Assignment of Minerals Lease, dated March 5, 2006 between
CM
Properties and Novastar Resources Ltd. (incorporated by reference
from
Exhibit 10.21 of the initial filing of this Registration Statement
on Form
S-4 filed June 14, 2006).
|
|
10.22
|
Office
Service Renewal Agreement, dated September 21, 2005, between Tysons
Business Center, LLC and Thorium Power (incorporated by reference
from
Exhibit 10.22 of the initial filing of this Registration Statement
on Form
S-4 filed June 14, 2006).
|
|
10.23
|
Sublease
Agreement, dated May 28, 2004, between Thorium Power and Carmen &
Muss, P.L.L.C. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.23 of the
initial filing of this Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed June
14,
2006).
|
|
10.24
|
Office
Building Lease, dated August 14, 2001, between Washington Real Estate
Investment Trust and Thorium Power (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit
10.24 of the initial filing of this Registration Statement on Form
S-4
filed June 14, 2006).
|
|
10.25
|
Teaming
Agreement dated February 22, 2006 between The University of Texas
System,
The University of Texas of the Permian Basin, The University of Texas
at
Austin, The University of Texas at Arlington, The University of Texas
at
Dallas, The University of Texas at El Paso, The City of Andrews,
Texas,
Andrews County, Texas, the Midland Development Corporation, the Odessa
Development Corporation, Thorium Power and General Atomics (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.25 of the initial filing of this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 filed June 14, 2006).
|
|
10.26
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, dated June 12,
2006,
among Novastar Resources, Ltd., Alan Gelband and Alan Gelband Company,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current report
of
Novastar on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2006).
|
|
10.27
|
Employment
Agreement, dated June 6, 2006, between Novastar Resources, Ltd. and
Cornelius J. Milmoe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed June 13,
2006).
|
|
10.28
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated June 6, 2006, between Novastar Resources,
Ltd. and
Cornelius J. Milmoe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed June 13,
2006).
|
|
10.29
|
Consulting
Agreement, dated June 12, 2006, between Novastar Resources, Ltd.
and Larry
Goldman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current
report
of Novastar on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2006).
|
|
10.30
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated June 12, 2006, between Novastar Resources,
Ltd.
and Larry Goldman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed June 13,
2006).
|
|
10.31
|
Office
Service Agreement, dated April 19, 2006, between Tysons Business
Center
LLC and Novastar Resources Ltd. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.31 of the initial filing of this Registration Statement on Form
S-4
filed June 14, 2006).
|
29
|
10.32
|
Employment
Agreement, dated July 27, 2006, between Novastar Resources, Ltd.
and
Andrey Mushakov (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
current
report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 4, 2006).
|
|
10.33
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated July 27, 2006, between Novastar Resources,
Ltd.
and Andrey Mushakov (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of
the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 4,
2006).
|
|
10.34
|
Employment
Agreement, dated July 27, 2006, between Novastar Resources, Ltd.
and
Thomas Graham, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 4,
2006).
|
|
10.35
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated July 27, 2006, between Novastar Resources,
Ltd.
and Thomas Graham, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
of the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 4,
2006).
|
|
10.36
|
Amendment
No. 2, dated August 8, 2006, to Agreement and Plan of Merger between
Novastar Resources Ltd., TP Acquisition Corp. and Thorium Power Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current report
of
Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2006).
|
|
10.37
|
Independent
Director Contract, dated August 21, 2006, between Novastar Resources,
Ltd.
and Victor Alessi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 25,
2006).
|
|
10.38
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated August 21, 2006, between Novastar Resources,
Ltd.
and Victor Alessi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
current report of Novastar on Form 8-K filed August 25,
2006).
|
|
14.1
|
Code
of Ethics (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed on November 25, 2005).
|
|
16.1
|
Letter
from Morgan and Company dated September 14, 2005 regarding change
in
independent accountant (incorporated by reference from Novastar’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 11, 2005).
|
|
23.1*
|
Consent
of Telford Sadovnick, P.L.L.C.
|
|
31.1*
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - Principal Executive
Officer
|
|
31.2*
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - Principal Accounting
Officer
|
|
32*
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
*
Filed herewith
30
Audit
Fees
The
aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services
rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Company's annual
financial statements and review of financial statements included in the
Company's Form 10-QSBs or services that are normally provided by the accountant
in connection with statutory and regulatory engagements for those fiscal years
were:
2006
-
$28,500
2005
-
$10,000
Audit
- Related Fees
The
aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and
related services by the principal accountants that are reasonably related to
the
performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements and
are
not reported in the preceding paragraph:
2006
-
$0
2005
-
$0
Tax
Fees
The
aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional
services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice,
and tax planning was:
2006
-
$0
2005
-
$0
All
Other Fees
The
aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for the products
and
services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported
in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) was:
2006
-
$0
2005
-
$0
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
In
September 2006, our Board of Directors adopted a resolution in accordance with
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requiring pre-approval of all auditing services
and all audit related, tax or other services not prohibited under Section 10A(g)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be performed for the
Corporation by its auditor, Telford Sadovnick P.L.L.C., subject to the
de
minimus
exception described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act.
31
In
accordance with section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the
Registrant caused this Report on Form 10-KSB to be signed on its behalf by
the
undersigned, thereto duly authorized individual.
Date:
September 27,
2006
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
/s/
Seth
Grae
By:
Seth
Grae
Chief
Executive Officer,
President
and Director
In
accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
|
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
|
/s/
Seth Grae
Seth
Grae
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/
Larry Goldman
Larry
Goldman
|
Acting
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
/s/
Thomas Graham, Jr.
Thomas
Graham, Jr.
|
Director
|
|
/s/
Cornelius J. Milmoe
Cornelius
J. Milmoe
|
Director
|
|
/s/
Victor Alessi
Victor
Alessi
|
Director
|
32
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD
(A
Development Stage Company)
JUNE
30, 2006
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
| Page | |
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
| Unaudited Pro Forma Balance Sheet - June 30, 2006 |
F-42
|
| Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Operations - June 30, 2006 |
F-43
|
F-1
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Novastar
Resources Ltd.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Novastar
Resources Ltd. (the
“Company”) (an Exploration Stage Company) as at June 30, 2006 and 2005, the
related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the years
then
ended and for the cumulative period from June 28, 1999 (inception) to June
30,
2006 and the related consolidated stockholders’ deficiency for the cumulative
period from June 28, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 2006. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits. We did not audit the Company’s cumulative data
from June 28, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 2004 in the consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows, which were audited by
other auditors whose report, dated September 27, 2004, which expressed an
unqualified opinion, has been furnished to us. Our opinion, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for cumulative data from June 28, 1999
(inception) to June 30, 2004, is based solely on the report of the other
auditors
.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Novastar
Resources Ltd. (an
Exploration Stage Company) as at June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the results of
its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period
from
June 28, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 2006 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/
TELFORD SADOVNICK, P.L.L.C.
CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Bellingham,
Washington
September
20, 2006
F-2
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
|
June
30
|
|||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
|||||||
|
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
14,431,407
|
$
|
802
|
|||
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
808,425
|
-
|
|||||
|
Total
current assets
|
15,239,832
|
802
|
|||||
|
Investment
- Thorium Power Inc.
|
1,350,000
|
-
|
|||||
|
Total
assets
|
$
|
16,589,832
|
$
|
802
|
|||
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
|
|||||||
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
463,354
|
$
|
121,438
|
|||
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
103,541
|
103,542
|
|||||
|
Due
to related parties
|
128,675
|
-
|
|||||
|
Due
to Thorium Power Inc.
|
264,740
|
-
|
|||||
|
Warrant
Liability - Note 9(ii)
|
3,678,278
|
-
|
|||||
|
Accrued
payroll tax liability
|
635,000
|
-
|
|||||
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
5,273,588
|
224,980
|
|||||
|
Total
Liabilities
|
5,273,588
|
224,980
|
|||||
|
Commitments
- Note 13
|
|||||||
|
Common
Stock With Registration Rights - Note 9(ii):
|
|||||||
|
Common
Stock subject to continuing registration, $0.001 par value,
36,659,837
shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006
(2005
- 0 shares)
|
12,041,373
|
-
|
|||||
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIENCY
|
|||||||
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 authorized shares; no
shares issued and outstanding
|
-
|
- | |||||
|
Voting
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 authorized shares;
118,101,637
shares issued and outstanding
(
2005 - 86,072,532)
|
118,101
|
86,073
|
|||||
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
14,913,153
|
4,328,081
|
|||||
|
Deferred
Stock Compensation
|
(83,328
|
)
|
(499,967
|
)
|
|||
|
Common
Stock and Warrants Reserved for Future Issuance
|
1,807,445
|
-
|
|||||
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
(4,138,365
|
)
|
|||
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
2,400
|
-
|
|||||
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficiency
|
(725,129
|
)
|
(224,178
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency
|
$
|
16,589,832
|
$
|
802
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-3
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
|
Years
Ended
|
Cumulative
Period from
June
28, 1999
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||
|
June
30
|
June
30
|
|||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
184,162
|
||||
|
Operating
Expenses
|
||||||||||
|
Consulting
|
5,770,133
|
2,303,533
|
8,268,046
|
|||||||
|
Forgiveness
of debt
|
-
|
(169,818
|
)
|
(169,818
|
)
|
|||||
|
General
and administrative
|
1,362,563
|
114,988
|
2,714,493
|
|||||||
|
Impairment
loss - equipment
|
-
|
-
|
12,445
|
|||||||
|
Impairment
loss - Mineral property acquisition costs
|
670,544
|
-
|
720,544
|
|||||||
|
Interest
attributable to beneficial conversion feature for notes
payable
|
-
|
442,813
|
580,057
|
|||||||
|
Mineral
property exploration expenses
|
394,516
|
-
|
394,516
|
|||||||
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
4,949,729
|
-
|
4,949,729
|
|||||||
|
13,147,485
|
2,691,516
|
17,470,012
|
||||||||
|
Operating
Loss
|
(13,147,485
|
)
|
(2,691,516
|
)
|
(17,285,850
|
)
|
||||
|
Other
Income and Expenses
|
||||||||||
|
Dividend
income
|
8,136
|
-
|
8,136
|
|||||||
|
Interest
income
|
72,435
|
-
|
72,435
|
|||||||
|
Legal
Settlement
|
(146,445
|
)
|
-
|
(146,445
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss
on fair value of warrant derivatives
|
(139,220
|
)
|
-
|
(139,220
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other
income
|
8,044
|
-
|
8,044
|
|||||||
|
Net
Loss
|
$
|
(13,344,535
|
)
|
$
|
(2,691,516
|
)
|
$
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
|
|
Net
Loss Per Common Share, Basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
||||
|
Weighted
Average Number Of Common Shares
|
||||||||||
|
Outstanding
|
111,913,155
|
57,188,970
|
||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
|
Years
Ended
|
Cumulative
Period from
June
28, 1999 (Inception) to
|
|||||||||
|
June
30
|
June
30
|
|||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
||||||||
|
Operating
Activities
|
||||||||||
|
Loss
for the year
|
$
|
(13,344,535
|
)
|
$
|
(2,691,516
|
)
|
$
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss from operations to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||||
|
Shares
issued for other than cash for payment of expences
|
10,686,652
|
2,339,533
|
13,071,185
|
|||||||
|
Loss
on fair value of warrant liability
|
139,220
|
-
|
139,220
|
|||||||
|
Interest
attributable to beneficial conversion feature
|
||||||||||
|
for
notes payable
|
-
|
442,813
|
580,057
|
|||||||
|
Amortization
of equipment
|
-
|
774
|
3,813
|
|||||||
|
Impairment
loss - mineral property acquisition costs
|
670,544
|
-
|
670,544
|
|||||||
|
Forgiveness
of debt
|
-
|
(169,818
|
)
|
(169,818
|
)
|
|||||
|
Impairment
loss - equipment
|
-
|
-
|
12,445
|
|||||||
|
Unrealized
gain on investment
|
2,400
|
-
|
2,400
|
|||||||
|
Changes
in non-cash operating working capital items:
|
||||||||||
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current liabilities
|
(808,425
|
)
|
-
|
(808,425
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
379,415
|
71,135
|
859,454
|
|||||||
|
Due
to related party
|
128,675
|
-
|
42,756
|
|||||||
|
Due
to Thorium Power Inc.
|
264,740
|
-
|
264,740
|
|||||||
|
Accrued
payroll tax liability
|
635,000
|
-
|
635,000
|
|||||||
|
Net
Cash (Used In) Operating Activities
|
(1,246,314
|
)
|
(7,079
|
)
|
(2,179,529
|
)
|
||||
|
Investing
Activities
|
||||||||||
|
Purchase
of equipment
|
-
|
-
|
(1,808
|
)
|
||||||
|
Acquisition
of long-term investment
|
(1,350,000
|
)
|
-
|
(1,350,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net
Cash (Used In) Investing Activities
|
(1,350,000
|
)
|
-
|
(1,351,808
|
)
|
|||||
|
Financing
Activities
|
||||||||||
|
Proceeds
from loan payable to shareholder
|
-
|
-
|
16,097
|
|||||||
|
Issue
of common shares
|
1,846,488
|
-
|
1,865,438
|
|||||||
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock with registration
rights
|
15,580,431
|
-
|
15,580,431
|
|||||||
|
Cash
paid for redemption of shares
|
(400,000
|
)
|
-
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Advances
on notes payable
|
-
|
7,881
|
900,000
|
|||||||
|
Cash
acquired on acquisition of subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
778
|
|||||||
|
Net
Cash Provided By Financing Activities
|
17,026,919
|
7,881
|
17,962,744
|
|||||||
|
Net
Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
14,430,605
|
802
|
14,431,407
|
|||||||
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning Of Period
|
802
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End Of Period
|
$
|
14,431,407
|
$
|
802
|
$
|
14,431,407
|
||||
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
||||||||||
|
Cash
paid during the year:
|
||||||||||
|
Interest
paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
|
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
|
Other (Note 12)
|
||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-5
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
PERIOD
FROM JUNE 28, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE
30, 2006
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Deferred
|
Common
Stock and Warrants Reserved for Future
|
Accumulated
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Compensation
|
Issuance
|
Deficit
|
Income
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of shares to founders
|
3,465
|
$
|
3
|
$
|
18,947
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
18,950
|
||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the period
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(159,909
|
)
|
-
|
(159,909
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2000
|
3,465
|
3
|
18,947
|
-
|
-
|
(159,909
|
)
|
-
|
(140,959
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase
of common stock by consideration of forgiveness of loan payable
to
shareholder
|
(1,445
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
16,098
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16,097
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2,020
|
2
|
35,045
|
-
|
-
|
(159,909
|
)
|
-
|
(124,862
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment
to number of shares issued and outstanding as a result of the
reverse
take-over transaction -
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Custom
Branded Networks, Inc.
|
(2,020
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Aquistar
Ventures (USA) Inc.
|
15,463,008
|
15,463
|
(15,463
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||
|
15,463,008
|
15,463
|
19,584
|
-
|
-
|
(159,909
|
)
|
-
|
(124,862
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
allotted in connection with the acquisition of Custom Branded
Networks,
Inc.
|
25,000,000
|
25,000
|
(9,772
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
15,228
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Less:
Allotted and not yet issued
|
(8,090,476
|
)
|
(8,090
|
)
|
8,090
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock conversion rights
|
-
|
-
|
421,214
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
421,214
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(723,239
|
)
|
-
|
(723,239
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2001
|
32,372,532
|
32,373
|
439,116
|
-
|
-
|
(883,148
|
)
|
-
|
(411,659
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
F-6
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY (Continued)
PERIOD
FROM JUNE 28, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE
30, 2006
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Deferred
|
Common
Stock and Warrants Reserved for Future
|
Accumulated
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Compensation
|
Issuance
|
Deficit
|
Income
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2001
|
32,372,532
|
$
|
32,373
|
$
|
439,116
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(883,148
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(411,659
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Additional
shares issued in connection with the acquisition of Custom
Branded
Networks, Inc.
|
1,500,000
|
1,500
|
(1,500
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock conversion rights
|
-
|
-
|
109,748
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
109,748
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(326,038
|
)
|
-
|
(326,038
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2002
|
33,872,532
|
33,873
|
547,364
|
-
|
-
|
(1,209,186
|
)
|
-
|
(627,949
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Issue
of common stock for deferred compensation expense
|
4,500,000
|
4,500
|
40,500
|
(45,000
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,500
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,500
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock conversion rights
|
-
|
-
|
45,116
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
45,116
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(142,233
|
)
|
-
|
(142,233
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2003
|
38,372,532
|
38,373
|
632,980
|
(22,500
|
)
|
-
|
(1,351,419
|
)
|
-
|
(702,566
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,500
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,500
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock conversion rights
|
-
|
-
|
3,301
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,301
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(95,430
|
)
|
-
|
(95,430
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2004
|
38,372,532
|
38,373
|
636,281
|
-
|
-
|
(1,446,849
|
)
|
-
|
(772,195
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Issue
of common stock for services
|
14,800,000
|
14,800
|
901,200
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
916,000
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issue
of common stock for convertible notes
|
20,000,000 | 20,000 | 484,166 |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
504,166 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Issue
of warrants for convertible notes
|
-
|
-
|
495,834
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
495,834
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issue
of common stock for services
|
11,600,000
|
11,600
|
1,583,900
|
(598,000
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
997,500
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Issue
of common stock for services
|
1,300,000
|
1,300
|
226,700
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
228,000
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
98,033
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
98,033
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,691,516
|
)
|
-
|
(2,691,516
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2005
|
86,072,532
|
86,073
|
4,328,081
|
(499,967
|
)
|
-
|
(4,138,365
|
)
|
-
|
(224,178
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
F-7
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY (Continued)
PERIOD
FROM JUNE 28, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE
30, 2006
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Deferred
|
Common
Stock and Warrants Reserved for Future
|
Accumulated
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Compensation
|
Issuance
|
Deficit
|
Income
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2005
|
86,072,532
|
$
|
86,073
|
$
|
4,328,081
|
$
|
(499,967
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(4,138,365
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(224,178
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Issuance
of common stock for services
|
17,610,776
|
17,611
|
3,679,269
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,696,880
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of common stock for settlement of debt
|
249,999
|
250
|
29,681
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
29,931
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of warrants for settlement of debt
|
-
|
-
|
7,569
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,569
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of common stock for property acquisition
|
6,000,000
|
6,000
|
1,604,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,610,000
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Stock
based compensation - employment agreement
|
5,000,000
|
5,000
|
4,145,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,150,000
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Private
placement for issuance of common stock
|
44,828,167
|
44,827
|
13,494,852
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13,539,679
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Reallocation
of proceeds from sales of common stock with registration
rights
|
(36,659,837
|
)
|
(36,660
|
)
|
(12,004,713
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(12,041,373
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Warrants
issued pursuant to private placement
|
-
|
-
|
348,185
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
348,185
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of stock as compensation for warrants cancelled by
shareholder
|
15,000,000
|
15,000
|
1,739,166
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,754,166
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
499,967
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
499,967
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(83,328
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(83,328
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase
of issued stock
|
(5,000,000
|
)
|
(5,000
|
)
|
(1,445,000
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,450,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Stock
returned to treasury
|
(15,000,000
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
(1,739,166
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,754,166
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Stock
reserved for future issuance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,690,700
|
-
|
-
|
1,690,700
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Stock
based compensation - stock reserved for future issuance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
73,500
|
-
|
-
|
73,500
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Warrants
reserved for future issuance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
43,245
|
-
|
-
|
43,245
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based
compensation - options
|
-
|
-
|
726,229
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
726,229
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Other
comprehensive income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,400
|
2,400
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(13,344,535
|
)
|
-
|
(13,344,535
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
118,101,637
|
$
|
118,101
|
$
|
14,913,153
|
$
|
(83,328
|
)
|
$
|
1,807,445
|
$
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
$
|
2,400
|
$
|
(725,129
|
)
|
|||||||
F-8
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY (Continued)
PERIOD
FROM JUNE 28, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE
30, 2006
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Deferred
|
Common
Stock and Warrants Reserved for Future
|
Accumulated
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Compensation
|
Issuance
|
Deficit
|
Income
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
$
|
(1,351,419
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficit
accumulated during the exploration stage
|
(16,131,481
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
$
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-9
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
1.
|
NATURE
OF OPERATIONS
|
Novastar
Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) (formerly Aquistar Ventures (USA) Inc. and Custom
Branded Networks, Inc.), incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 28,
1999,
was previously engaged in the business of providing turnkey private label
internet services to organizations throughout the domestic United States
and
Canada.
On
February 2, 2001, Aquistar Ventures (USA) Inc. ("Aquistar") acquired 100%
of the
issued and outstanding shares of Custom Branded Networks, Inc. ("Custom
Branded") by
allotting 25,000,000 common shares. Since the transaction resulted in the
former
shareholders of Custom Branded owning the majority of the issued shares of
Aquistar, the transaction, which is referred to as a "reverse take-over",
has
been treated for accounting purposes as an acquisition by Custom Branded
of the
net assets and liabilities of Aquistar. Under this purchase method of
accounting, the results of operations of Aquistar are included in these
financial statements from February 2, 2001. Control of the net assets of
Aquistar was acquired for the total consideration of $15,228 representing
the
fair value of the assets of Aquistar. Custom Branded was deemed to be the
purchaser for accounting purposes. Accordingly, its net assets were included
in
the balance sheet at their previously recorded values.
During
the year ended June 30, 2003, the Company became an exploration stage company
engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral claims. Upon location
of a
commercial minable reserve, the Company expects to actively prepare the site
for
its extraction and enter a development stage. During the year ended June
30,
2005, the Company charged its name to Novastar Resources Ltd. and increased
its
authorized common shares from 50,000,000 to 250,000,000 and authorized
50,000,000 preferred shares for issuance at a par value of $0.001.
The
Company is planning to merge in October 2006 with Thorium
Power Inc. (see Note 14).
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
|
a)
|
Consolidation
|
|
These
financial statements include the accounts of the Company (a Nevada
corporation) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Custom Branded Networks,
Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and TP Acquisition Corp., (a Delaware
corporation). All significant intercompany transactions and balances
have
been eliminated.
|
| b) |
Use
of Estimates
|
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to
make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The
consolidated financial statements include some amounts that are based on
management’s best estimates and judgments. The most significant estimates relate
to valuation of stock grants and stock options, impairment charges for mineral
acquisition costs and contingent liabilities. These estimates may be adjusted
as
more current information becomes available, and any adjustment could be
significant in future periods.
| c) | Prior Year Reclassifications |
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to
conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no
effect
on previously reported results of operations or accumulated deficit.
F-10
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
|
| c) | Prior Year Reclassifications (Continued) |
In
the
prior year June 30, 2005 presentation, the Company has combined two asset
accounts on the Balance Sheet, restricted cash held in an attorney’s escrow
account and cash refundable to investors. The Company has also reported accrued
liabilities and accounts payable as separate captions on the Balance Sheet.
Also
in the stockholders’ equity section on the Balance Sheet and Statement of
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency), the additional paid-in capital from various
equity securities issued were combined into one additional paid-in capital
account. On the Statement of Operations, certain general and administrative
expenses were combined into the one expense caption called general and
administrative expenses. The categories on the Statement of Cash Flows were
not
affected by the prior year reclassifications.
| d) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash
and
cash equivalents consist primarily of cash on deposit, money market accounts,
and investment grade commercial paper that are readily convertible into cash
and
purchased with original maturities of three months or less.
As
part
of its cash management program, the Company from time to time maintains a
portfolio of marketable investment securities. The securities are investment
grade and include tax and tax exempt securities and have a term to earliest
maturity of less than 3 months. These marketable securities, classified as
available for sale, are recorded at market value.
|
e)
|
Equipment
|
Equipment
is recorded at cost and will be depreciated over its useful life on a straight
line basis. As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, the equipment has been fully
depreciated.
|
f)
|
Income
Taxes
|
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method in accordance
with
SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes." Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and
their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the
period that includes the enactment date.
F-11
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
|
|
f)
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
Deferred
tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that the
recoverability of the asset is unlikely to be recognized.
The
Company did not provide any current or deferred income tax provision or benefit
for any periods presented to date because the Company has continued to
experience a net operating loss since inception.
|
g)
|
Mineral
Property Acquisition Costs and Exploration
Expenditures
|
|
The
Company follows a policy of capitalizing mineral property acquisition
costs and expensing mineral property exploration expenditures until
a
production decision is made in respect of the project and the Company
is
reasonably assured that it will receive regulatory approval to
permit
mining operations which may include the receipt of a legally binding
project approval certificate.
|
|
Management
periodically reviews the carrying value of its investments in mineral
leases and claims with internal and external mining related professionals.
A decision to abandon, reduce or expand a specific project is based
upon
many factors including general and specific assessments of mineral
deposits, anticipated future mineral prices, anticipated future
costs of
exploring, developing and operating a production mine, the expiration
term
and ongoing expenses of maintaining mineral properties and the
general
likelihood that the Company will continue exploration on such project.
The
Company does not set a pre-determined holding period for properties
with
unproven deposits, however, properties which have not demonstrated
suitable metal concentrations at the conclusion of each phase of
an
exploration program are re-evaluated to determine if future exploration
is
warranted, whether there has been any impairment in value and that
their
carrying values are appropriate.
|
|
If
an area of interest is abandoned or it is determined that its carrying
value cannot be supported by future production or sale, the related
costs
or impairment loss is charged against operations in the year of
abandonment or determination of value. The amounts recorded as
mineral
leases and claims represent costs to date and do not necessarily
reflect
present or future values.
|
|
The
Company’s exploration activities and proposed mine development are subject
to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment. These laws are continually changing, generally becoming
more
restrictive. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future,
if
it continues its mining operations, expenditures to comply with
such laws
and regulations.
|
F-12
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
|
|
g)
|
Mineral
Property Acquisition Costs and Exploration Expenditures
(Continued)
|
|
The
accumulated costs of properties that are developed on the stage
of
commercial production will be amortized to operations using the
unit-of-production depletion method.
|
|
h)
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
payable, accrued liabilities, accrued payroll tax liability, warrant liability
and amounts due to related parties and Thorium Power Inc.
Management
of the Company does not believe that the Company is subject to significant
interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.
The
respective carrying values of financial instruments, other than the warrants
(note 9) approximate their fair values. Fair values were assumed to approximate
carrying values since they are short-term in nature or they are receivable
or
payable on demand.
|
i)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (FAS-123R), Share-Based
Payment, which
is
a revision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (FAS-123),
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. In
addition to requiring supplemental disclosures, FAS-123R addresses the
accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives
goods or services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the company or
(b)
liabilities that are based on the fair value of the company’s equity instruments
or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. FAS-123R
focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which a company obtains
employee services
in share-based payment transactions. The Statement eliminates the ability
to
account for share-based compensation transactions using Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 (APB-25), Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,
and
generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value
based method. Accordingly, proforma disclosure is no longer an
alternative.
Under
FAS-123R, the Company is required to recognize compensation cost for the
portion
of outstanding awards previously accounted for under the provisions of APB-25
for which the requisite service had not been rendered as of the adoption
date
for this Statement. The Statement also requires companies to estimate
forfeitures of stock compensation awards as of the grant date of the award.
F-13
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
|
|
i)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
FAS-123R
permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of the following
two methods:
| · |
A
“modified prospective” method in which compensation cost is recognized
beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements
of
FAS-123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective
date and
(b) based on the requirements of FAS-123 for all awards granted
to
employees prior to the effective date of FAS-123R that remain unvested
on
the effective date; or
|
| · |
A
“modified retrospective” method, which includes the requirements of the
modified prospective method described above but also permits entities
to
restate, based on the amounts previously recognized under FAS-123
for
purposes of pro forma disclosures, either (a) all prior periods
presented
for which FAS-123 was effective or (b) prior interim periods of
the year
in which FAS-123R is adopted.
|
The
Company adopted FAS-123R on January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective
method. The valuation of the stock issued to consultants for consulting services
are valued as of the date of the agreements with the various consultants.
References
to the issuances of restricted stock is stock issued to individuals whom
are
eligible to sell all or some of their shares of restricted common stock
by means
of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule
144,
promulgated under the Securities Act ("Rule 144"), subject to certain
limitations. In general, pursuant to Rule 144, a stockholder (or stockholders
whose shares are aggregated) who has satisfied a one-year holding period
may,
under certain circumstances, sell within any three-month period a number
of
securities which does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding
shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume of the class
during
the four calendar weeks prior to such sale. Rule 144 also permits, under
certain
circumstances, the sale of securities, without any limitations, by a
non-affiliate of our company that has satisfied a two-year holding
period.
| j) | Warrants |
Warrants
issued in conjunction with equity financing were accounted for under the
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-19, ‘Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in a Company’s Own
Stock’.
|
k)
|
Basic
and Diluted Loss per Share
|
In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 128 (“SFAS 128”), “Earnings Per Share”, the
basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to
common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted loss per common share is computed similar to basic loss per common
share
except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares
had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. At June
30,
2006 and 2005, the Company stock equivalents were anti-dilutive and excluded
in
the earnings per share computation.
F-14
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
|
|
l)
|
Impairment
Charges
|
Unlike
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the accounting rules do
not
provide for an annual impairment test in determining whether property, plant,
and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets (e.g., customer lists) are
impaired. Instead, they require that a triggering event occur before testing
an
asset for impairment. Examples of such triggering events include a significant
disposal of a portion of such assets, an adverse change in the market involving
the business employing the related asset, a significant decrease in the benefits
realized from an acquired business, difficulties or delays in integrating
the
business and a significant change in the operations of an acquired
business.
Once
a
triggering event has occurred, the impairment test employed is based on whether
the intent is to hold the asset for continued use or to hold the asset for
sale.
If the intent is to hold the asset for continued use, the impairment test
involves a comparison of undiscounted cash flows against the carrying value
of
the asset as an initial test. If the carrying value of such asset exceeds
the
undiscounted cash flow, the asset would be deemed to be impaired. Impairment
would then be measured as the difference between the fair value of the fixed
or
amortizing intangible asset and the carrying value to determine the amount
of
the impairment. The Company generally determines fair value by using the
discounted cash flow method. If the intent is to hold the asset for sale
and
certain other criteria are met (i.e., the asset can be disposed of currently,
appropriate levels of authority have approved sale, and there is an actively
pursuing buyer), the impairment test is a comparison of the asset’s carrying
value to its fair value less costs to sell. To the extent that the carrying
value is greater than the asset’s fair value less costs to sell, an impairment
loss is recognized for the difference. Assets held for sale are separately
presented on the balance sheet and are no longer depreciated.
| m) |
Foreign
Currency Translation
|
The
Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Transaction gains and losses
that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in
a
currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of
operations as incurred. Transactions in foreign currency are translated into
U.S. dollars as follows:
| a. |
monetary
items at the rate prevailing at the balance sheet
date;
|
| b. |
non-monetary
items at the historical exchange
rate;
|
| c. |
revenue
and expenses that are monetary items are valued at the average
rate in
effect during the applicable accounting
period.
|
F-15
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
| 2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
| n) |
Revenue
Recognition
|
If
revenue is derived from future sales of minerals, it will be recognized when
the
risks and rewards of ownership pass to the purchaser, including delivery
of the
product the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Settlement adjustments, if any, will be reflected in
revenue
when the amounts are known.
| o) |
Comprehensive
Income
|
Comprehensive
income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting shareholders’
equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles are excluded
from
net income. For the Company, such items consist primarily of unrealized gains
and losses on marketable equity investments, which the Company have classified
as cash equivalents.
| p) |
Asset
Retirement Obligations
|
The
Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 (“SFAS
143”), “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, which requires that an
asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) associated with the retirement of a tangible
long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which it is
incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting increase in the carrying
amount of the associated asset. The cost of the tangible asset, including
the
initially recognized ARO, is depleted, such that the cost of the ARO is
recognized over the useful life of the asset. The ARO is recorded at fair
value,
and accretion expense is recognizable over time as the discounted liability
is
accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO is measured
using expected future cash flow, discounted at the Company’s credit-adjusted
risk-free interest rate. To date, no material asset retirement obligation
exists
due to the early stage of the Company's mineral exploration. Accordingly,
no
liability has been recorded.
| q) |
Environmental
Protection and Reclamation Costs
|
The
operations of the Company have been, and may in the future be affected from
time
to time in varying degrees by changes in environmental regulations, including
those for future removal and site restorations costs. Both the likelihood
of new
regulations and their overall effect upon the Company may vary from region
to
region and are not predictable.
Environmental
expenditures that relate to ongoing environmental and reclamation programs
are
charged against statements of operations as incurred or capitalized and
amortized depending upon their future economic benefits. The Company does
not
anticipate any material capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities.
F-16
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
2. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
| r) |
Advertising
Costs
|
Advertising
costs are expensed as incurred. No advertising costs were incurred in fiscal
years 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
s)
|
Exploration
Stage Enterprise
|
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual
method of accounting and according to the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 7 (“SFAS 7”), “Accounting and Reporting for Development
Stage Enterprises,” as it were devoting substantially all of its efforts to
acquiring and exploring mineral properties. It is industry practice that
mining
companies in the development stage are classified under Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles as exploration stage companies. Until such properties
are
acquired and developed, the Company will continue to prepare its consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with entities
in the
exploration or development stage.
| t) |
Investments
|
Management
determines the appropriate classification of its investments in debt and
equity
securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such determination at
each
balance sheet date. The
Company reviews its marketable equity holdings in private companies on a
regular
basis to determine if any security has experienced an other-than-temporary
decline in fair value. The Company considers the investee company’s cash
position, earnings and revenue outlook, stock price performance, liquidity
and
management ownership, among other factors, in its review. If it is determined
that an other-than-temporary decline exists in a marketable equity security,
the
Company writes down the investment to its market value and records the related
write-down as an investment loss in its Statement of Operations.
| 3. |
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
| a) | In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 is an interpretation of SFAS No. 143, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” which was issued in June 2001. FIN 47 was issued to address diverse accounting practices that have developed with regard to the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. According to FIN 47, uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective no later than December 31, 2005 for the Company. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FIN 47 on its financial statements. |
F-17
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
| 3. |
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
|
| b) |
In
May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No.
154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (SFAS No. 154) which
replaces APB No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements - an Amendment
of APB
Opinion No. 28”. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the methods issuers
should use to account for and reporting accounting changes and
error
corrections. Specifically, this statement requires that issuers
retrospectively apply any voluntary change in accounting principles
to
prior period financial statements, if it is practicable to do so.
This
principle replaces APB No. 20, which required that most voluntary
changes
in accounting principle be recognized by including the cumulative
effect
of the change to the new accounting principle on prior periods
in the net
income reported by the issuer in the period in which it instituted
the
change. SFAS No. 154 also redefines the term “restatement” to mean the
correction of an error by revising previously issued financial
statements.
Unless adopted early, SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting
changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December
15,
2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 154
to have an
impact on its financial position or result of
operations.
|
The
Company is currently evaluating the effect of other new accounting
pronouncements on its future statements of financial position and results
of
operations.
4.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash
and
cash equivalents consist of the following:
|
JUNE
30
|
|||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
Cash
on deposit
|
$
|
1,316,993
|
$
|
802
|
|||
|
Investment
grade commercial paper - Note 2(d)
|
12,019,947
|
-
|
|||||
|
Money
market funds
|
1,043,235
|
-
|
|||||
|
Funds
held in attorney trust account
|
51,232
|
-
|
|||||
|
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
14,431,407
|
$
|
802
|
|||
Cash
and
cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments
with an
initial maturity of three months or less. The Company places its temporary
cash
investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times cash
balances and such investments may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) insurance limit.
F-18
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
| 5. |
INVESTMENT
/ DUE TO THORIUM POWER
INC.
|
As
disclosed in Note 14, as of June 30, 2006 the Company has invested a total
of
$1,350,000 in Thorium Power Inc. (“Thorium Power”). The investment consists of
337,500 common shares of Thorium Power purchased at $4.00 per share, which
represents approximately 9% of the issued and outstanding common shares of
Thorium Power as at June 30, 2006. The Company’s investment is being carried at
cost. There are no undistributed earnings in Thorium Power. There is no market
for the common stock of Thorium Power and accordingly, no quoted market price
is
available.
Thorium
Power charged the Company for certain shared expenses. These expenses consisted
of legal fees that were incurred by Thorium Power on behalf of the Company,
in connection with the upcoming merger. The Company believes that its allocation
method for these legal fees is reasonable. Amounts charged from Thorium Power
have directly increased the Company’s general and administrative expenses by
$264,740 for the year ended June 30, 2006. This amount remains payable as
at
June 30, 2006, and accordingly is shown as a current liability under the
caption
“Due to Thorium Power Inc.”.
| 6. |
OFFICER
COMPENSATION / ACCRUED PAYROLL TAX
LIABILITY
|
The
Company signed an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
on February 14, 2006 and issued 5 million shares in compensation, in accordance
with the agreement. The Board of Directors on September 18, 2006 had unanimously
voted to redeem 2 million shares of this stock grant, at a price of $0.31
per
share, from the CEO, in order to pay the payroll taxes due on this stock
issuance. This stock valuation was done after the stock grant and the stock
price was recently determined by an independent third party valuation company,
for payroll tax reporting purposes, to be $0.31 per share on the date of
issuance. The difference between the amount recorded in these financial
statements of $4,150,000 - see note 9 (iv) (b) and the amount reported for
income tax purposes valued above at $1,550,000 is $2,600,000, which is
non-deductible stock-based compensation.
The
third
party valuation was completed solely for income tax reporting purposes. The
payroll tax liability is being offset in the Balance Sheet under the caption
“Prepaid expenses and other current assets”, which is due from the officer, as
these payroll taxes have not yet been paid to the Internal Revenue Service.
There
may
be penalties and interest charged by the Internal Revenue Service to the
Company
on these payroll taxes due. This penalty and interest amount has not been
accrued at June 30, 2006, since the stock price on September 18, 2006, when
the
2 million shares were redeemed by the Company, traded at a market price of
$0.40
per share, which exceeds the above redemption price of $0.31 per share, the
stock price used for measuring the stock compensation for income tax purposes.
This total excess market value of $0.09 per share ($0.40 versus $0.31) totals
$180,000, which will be a reduction in compensation expense, which will offset
or reduce the total potential penalty amount that may be charged to the Company.
These above transactions occurred after the Company’s fiscal year end and will
be reflected in our next quarterly filing, for the three month period ending
September 30, 2006.The estimated payroll tax due to the Internal Revenue
Service
for this 5 million stock grant, based on a combined 40% effective tax rate
for
Federal and State payroll and income taxes, is $620,000.
The
Company also signed an employment agreement with its Chief Operating Officer
(“COO”) on June 5, 2006 and subsequent to the year ended June 30, 2006, issued
75,000 shares in compensation, in accordance with the agreement, see note
9(iv)(d). The Company recorded an additional payroll tax liability of $15,000
on
this stock issuance.
These
amounts are management’s best estimates of the payroll tax liability at June 30,
2006 The Company anticipates paying these payroll taxes to the Internal Revenue
Service in its next quarterly payroll tax filing, for the period ended September
30, 2006.
F-19
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
7.
|
MINERAL
PROPERTIES
|
| i) | Properties |
| a) | On May 1, 2005 the Company entered into an agreement to purchase a 92.25% interest in three mineral interests located in the state of Queensland, Australia. This agreement was replaced and superseded by an agreement dated September 30, 2005, to increase the Company’s purchase to a 100% interest. As consideration, the Company issued 5,000,000 restricted common shares of the Company to the vendor at a deemed value price of $1,450,000 (issued on October 21, 2005). In addition, the Company must incur the following exploration expenditures, not to exceed $695,000: |
|
i)
|
$125,000
by December 31, 2006;
|
ii) an
additional $150,000 by December 31, 2007;
iii) an
additional $140,000 by December 31, 2008;
iv) an
additional $140,000 by December 31, 2009;
v) an
additional $140,000 by December 31, 2010.
The
vendor retains a 2.5% net smelter return royalty on the property.
On
February 20, 2006 the Company repurchased the 5,000,000 common shares from
the
vendor for cash consideration of $400,000. The difference between the deemed
price at the date of issuance of $1,450,000 and the repurchase price of these
shares was $1,050,000, which was recorded as a reduction or recovery of the
impairment loss recorded. The Company can still acquire the 100% interest
by
incurring the exploration expenditures disclosed above. Once returned to
the
Company’s treasury, these 5,000,000 shares were cancelled.
In
February 2006, the Company and the vendor amended these lease agreements
with a
separate amendment agreement, where the sole remedy to the vendor for a breach
of the agreement by the Company is for the vendor to terminate the mineral
lease
agreements, with no further relief or recourse against the Company.
| b) |
On
September 14, 2005 the Company entered into an agreement whereby
certain
mineral leases in the Clay County District of Alabama were assigned
to the
Company. The Company assumed a lease held by the lessee, for consideration
of $100,000 cash (paid as of June 30, 2006), 1,000,000 restricted
common
shares of the Company at a deemed price of $160,000 (issued on
October 21,
2005) and a $15 per ton net royalty of Thorium/monazite removed
from the
leased properties.
|
F-20
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
7.
|
MINERAL
PROPERTIES
(Continued)
|
| i) | Properties (Continued) |
| c) |
On
December 31, 2005 the Company entered into an agreement with
CM Properties
and Mr. Merchant, whereby certain mineral leases in the Cleburne
County District of Alabama can be assigned to the Company. The
Company
will assume 51% of a lease held by the lessee, who subsequently
became an
officer of the Company but no longer serves as an officer as
of June 30,
2006, for consideration of 2,000,000 restricted common shares
of the
Company. In addition, the Company must incur $1,500,000 on property
expenditures and for each $100,000 in additional expenditures;
the Company
will receive an additional 4% interest in the lease up to a maximum
of an
extra 40% interest. Upon reaching a 91% interest, the lessee
shall retain
a 9% interest and shall receive $17.50 per ounce of pure Platinum
Group
Metal (PGM) produced. For each 2,500 ounces of PGM produced,
the lessee
shall receive an additional 1,000,000 restricted common shares
of the
Company, up to a maximum of 8,000,000 shares, for a period of
two years
from the acquisition of the Company’s 91% interest being
obtained. Aspects
of the contract remain executory, and the company has not issued
the
2,000,000 shares, while entities controlled by CM Properties continue
to oversee the properties and are reimbursed by the Company for
their
services. In February 2006, the Company and CM Properties amended
the
lease agreements to make the sole remedy to CM Properties for
a breach of
the agreement by the Company termination of the mineral lease
agreements,
with no further relief or recourse against the Company.
Accordingly, the balance sheet does not reflect the value of
the property
(this value determined by the stock value of the 2 million shares at
the date of the agreement - $380,000) as an asset nor does it
reflect the Company's obligation to issue the shares (valued
at
the stock value of $380,000) as common stock reserved for
future issuance (an equity account on the balance
sheet).
|
| ii) |
Impairment
Loss
|
| In 2006, during the course of the Company’s strategic review of its mineral exploration operations, the Company recorded a net impairment charge of $670,544 (non-deductible for income tax purposes) relating to the impairment of all mineral acquisition costs when it was determined that future undiscounted and discounted cash flows associated with these assets were insufficient to recover their carrying values. These assets may have a nominal value, but were written down at June 30, 2006 to $0. |
F-21
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
8. CONVERTIBLE
NOTE PAYABLE
On
January, 31, 2002 the Company executed a total of $1,000,000 of convertible
notes due not earlier than January 31, 2009. These notes were secured by
the
assets of the Company. The Company received $1,000,000 in advances through
to
June 20, 2005 (2004 - $892,119), including in-kind consideration of $100,000.
The notes bore no interest until the maturity date.
On
January 20, 2005 the Company issued 20,000,000 common shares at a price of
$0.05
per share, and 20,000,000 warrants, for the purchase of 20,000,000 shares
of
common stock of the Company, to the holder, who converted these notes into
stocks and warrants. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.05 per
share
until January 20, 2008. The warrants were valued using the Black Scholes
option
pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average expected
life of
3 years, volatility of 284%, rate of quarterly dividends - 0%,
risk
free interest rate of 3.5%. The $1,000,000 consideration was allocated to
the
common stock issued and share purchase warrants based upon their relative
fair
values on the date of conversion. The amount allocated to the common shares
issued was $504,166. The amount allocated to the share purchase warrants
was
$495,834.
Because
the market interest rate on similar types of notes was approximately 14%
per
annum the day the notes were issued, the Company had recorded a discount
of
$579,378 related to the beneficial conversion feature. During the year ended
June 30, 2005, $442,813 was amortized and recorded as interest expense. The
discount was fully amortized as interest expense upon conversion.
During
the year ended June 30, 2006 the 20,000,000 share purchase warrants were
exchanged by mutual agreement of the holder and the Company, in return for
15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On
February 20, 2006 the holder returned these 15,000,000 common shares to the
Company’s treasury for cancellation. The Company did not compensate the holder
for the return of these shares. These shares were returned back to the
Company
in order to facilitate the future merger with Thorium Power Inc. and its
stockholders, as disclosed in Note 14.
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL
|
|
i)
|
Common
Stock
|
|
a)
|
On
August 3, 2005 the Company issued 800,000 restricted shares of
common
stock to its former advisory board as compensation for consulting
services
performed. The value attributed to these shares was $128,000 ($0.16
per
share).
|
F-22
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL
(Continued)
|
|
i)
|
Common
Stock (Continued)
|
|
b)
|
On
September 22, 2005 the Company issued a total of 4,187,500 shares
of
common stock to outside consultants as payment for various services
rendered on behalf of the Company. Of the total issuance, 4,000,000
were
issued pursuant to the March 2005 Compensation Plan, while 187,500
were
issued pursuant to the August 2005 Augmented Compensation Plan.
The value
attributed to these shares in total was $462,828 ($0.11 per
share).
|
|
c)
|
On
September 30, 2005 the Company issued 300,000 shares of restricted
common
stock to an outside consultant as payment for services rendered
for
mineral exploration activities. These shares were issued pursuant
to the
August 2005 Augmented Compensation Plan, and the value attributed
was
$51,000 ($0.17 per share).
|
|
d)
|
On
October 21, 2005 the Company issued 1,000,000 restricted common
shares
with value of $160,000 ($0.16 per share at the agreement date)
for mineral
property acquisition costs, as described in note
7(i)(b).
|
|
e)
|
On
October 21, 2005 the Company issued 5,000,000 restricted common
shares
with value of $1,450,000 ($0.29 per share at the agreement date)
for
mineral property acquisition costs, as described in note
7(i)(c).
|
|
f)
|
On
November 1, 2005 the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock
to an
outside consultant as payment for his services rendered for mineral
exploration activities. These shares were issued pursuant to the
August
2005 Augmented Compensation Plan and the value attributed to these
shares
was $51,000 ($0.17 per share).
|
|
g)
|
On
November 23, 2005 the Company closed a private placement of $631,500,
consisting of an offering of 4,209,998 units of at a price of $0.15
per
unit. Each unit consists of one common share of restricted stock
and
one-half of a non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant
entitles the holder thereof to acquire one additional share of
common
stock at a price of $0.30 per share and have an expiry date of
twelve
months from the closing date of the subscription. The warrants
were valued
using the Black Scholes option pricing model using the following
assumptions: weighted average expected life of 1 year, volatility
of 141%,
rate of quarterly dividends -0%, risk free interest rate of 3.61%.
The
amount allocated to the share purchase warrants was $127,467. Of
the
4,209,998 units issued in the private placement, 249,999 units
were issued
as settlement of debt of $37,500. The remainder of the units were
issued
for total cash proceeds of
$594,000.
|
F-23
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
i)
|
Common
Stock (Continued)
|
|
h)
|
On
December 1, 2005 the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of restricted
common
stock as compensation for the cancellation of 20,000,000 share
purchase
warrants, which were issued during the year ended June 30, 2005,
as
described in note 8, with a value of $495,834. The total value
attributable to the compensating shares was $2,250,000 ($0.15 per
share).
On February 20, 2006, all 15,000,000 of these shares were returned
to the
Company’s treasury for
cancellation.
|
|
i)
|
On
December 1, 2005 the Company issued 3,658,333 shares of common
stock to
various outside consultants as payment for various services rendered
on
behalf of the Company. The total issuance was pursuant to the August
2005
Augmented Compensation Plan. The value attributed to these shares
was
$621,916 ($0.17 per share).
|
|
j)
|
On
December 1, 2005 the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of restricted
common
stock to an outside consultant, who subsequently became the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer, as payment for services rendered. The
value
attributable to these shares was $192,500 ($0.15 and $0.17 per
share
issuances).
|
|
k)
|
On
December 1, 2005 the Company issued 550,000 shares of common stock
to
outside consultants as payment for their services rendered regarding
our
mineral exploration activities. These shares were issued pursuant
to the
August 2005 Augmented Compensation Plan and the value attributed
to these
shares was $93,500 ($0.17 per
share).
|
|
l)
|
On
January 9, 2006 the Company issued 355,714 shares of restricted
common
stock to 3West LLC for drilling services in the Clay County District
of
Alabama. These shares were issued pursuant to a drilling agreement
at
$0.29 per share for total consideration of
$104,173.
|
|
m)
|
On
January 11, 2006 the Company issued 3,100,000 shares of common
stock to
various outside consultants as payment for various services rendered
on
behalf of the Company. The total issuance was pursuant to the August
2005
Augmented Compensation Plan. The value attributed to these shares
was
$527,000 ($0.17 per share), which was the market price on the date
of the
agreements.
|
|
n)
|
On
January 24, 2006 the Company issued 181,428 shares of restricted
common
stock to 3West LLC for drilling services in the Clay County District
of
Alabama. The shares were issued pursuant to a drilling agreement
at $0.29
per share for total consideration of
$53,132.
|
F-24
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
i)
|
Common
Stock (Continued)
|
|
o)
|
On
January 27, 2006 the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted
common
stock to an outside consultant as payment for his services rendered.
The
value attributed to these shares was $94,500 ($0.63 per
share).
|
|
p)
|
On
February 2, 2006 the Company issued 135,545 shares of restricted
common
stock to 3West LLC for drilling services in the Clay County District
of
Alabama. The shares were issued pursuant to a drilling agreement
at $0.29
per share for total consideration of
$39,695.
|
|
q)
|
On
February 13, 2006 the Company issued 2,389,558 shares of restricted
common
stock to an outside consultant as payment for services rendered,
and a
portion for services to be rendered. The value attributed to these
shares
was $955,823 ($0.40 per share).
|
|
r)
|
On
February 20, 2006 15,000,000 shares at the Company’s common stock were
returned to treasury for cancellation, as described in Note
8.
|
|
s)
|
On
February 20, 2006 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were
returned to treasury for cancellation, as described in Note
7(a).
|
|
t)
|
On
March 30, 2006 3,374,998 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued
pursuant to a private placement whereby the Company offered 4,208,331
units at $0.30 per unit for cash proceeds of $1,262,500. The proceeds
were
used to complete the proposed merger with Thorium Power Inc. as
described
in Note 14. Each unit consists of one share of restricted common
stock and
one-half of a non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole
warrant
entitles the holder thereof to acquire one additional share of
common
stock at a price of $0.50 per share and expires twelve months from
the
closing date of the subscription. The warrants were valued using
the Black
Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted
average expected life of 1 year, volatility of 148%, rate of quarterly
dividends 0%, risk free interest rate of 2.86%. The amount allocated
to
the share purchase warrants was $281,117. The remaining 833,333
shares
were issued on April 25, 2006.
|
| u) | On June 29, 2006, the Company issued 252,698 shares of restricted common stock to an outside consultant as payment for services rendered. The value attributable to these shares was $101,079 ($0.40 per share). |
F-25
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
| ii) |
Common
Stock Issued With Registration
Rights
|
On
May 4,
2006, the Company completed a private placement with certain investors for
an
aggregate of 36,659,837 units, consisting of 36,659,837 shares of its restricted
common stock and 18,329,919 common stock purchase warrants for $15,580,431.
Each
unit consists of one share of common stock and one-half of a non-transferable
share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder thereof to
acquire one additional share of common stock at a price of $0.65 per share
and
expires twelve months from the closing date of the subscription.
Under
the
terms of the sale, the investors were granted certain registration rights
in
which the Company agreed to timely file a registration statement to register
the
common shares and the shares underlying the warrants, obtain effectiveness
of
the registration statement by the SEC within 120 days of May 4, 2006, and
maintain the effectiveness of this registration statement for a preset time
thereafter. In the event the Company fails to timely perform under the
registration rights agreement, the Company agrees to pay the investors
liquidated damages in an amount equal to 2% of the aggregate amount invested
by
the investors for each 30-day period or pro rata for any portion thereof
following the date by which the registration statement should have been
effective. The initial registration statement was filed and has not yet been
declared effective by the SEC within the allowed time.
The
Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") is currently reviewing the accounting
for
securities with liquidated damages clauses as stated in EITF 05-04, "The
Effect
of a Liquidated Damages Clause on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject
to
EITF 00-19." There are currently several views as to how to account for this
type of transaction and the EITF has not yet reached a consensus. In accordance
with EITF 00-19, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
To,
and Potentially Settled in the Company's Own Stock," and EITF 05-04, because
of
the potential liquidated damages for failure to obtain and maintain an effective
registration statement is substantial, the value of the common stock subject
to
such registration rights should be classified as temporary equity. Additionally,
in accordance with EITF 00-19 and the terms of the above warrants, the fair
value of the warrants should be recorded as a liability, with an offsetting
reduction to shareholders’ equity. The warrant liability is initially measured
at fair value using the Black Scholes option pricing model, and is then
re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported
as
non-cash charges or credits to earnings.
F-26
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
| ii) Common Stock Issued With Registration Rights (Continued) |
The
SEC
concluded that under EITF 00-19, common stock and warrants subject to
registration rights where significant liquidated damages could be required
to be
paid to the holder of the instrument in the event the issuer fails to maintain
the effectiveness of a registration statement for a preset time period, the
common stock subject to such liquidated damages does not meet the tests required
for shareholders’ equity classification, and accordingly must be reflected
between liabilities and shareholders’ equity in the balance
sheet until the conditions are eliminated. In analyzing instruments
under EITF 00-19, the likelihood or probability related to the failure to
maintain an effective registration statement is not a factor.
Based
on
the above interpretation, as of June 30, 2006, the Company classified
$12,041,373 for the value of common stock subject to registration rights
as
temporary equity instead of shareholders’ equity. In addition, the Company
measured the initial fair value of the warrants on the closing date at
$3,539,058 and classified the fair value of the warrants as warrant liability
instead of shareholders’ equity.
An
additional 733,196 warrants have been reserved for the subscribers, representing
4% of the warrants originally issued under the private placement. This
additional grant represents a warrant penalty in accordance with the placement’s
registration rights, as management had determined that they will require
an
additional time past the specified date of effectiveness of September 4,
2006,
in the Registration Rights agreement to complete the registration of the
units.
The total warrants were valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model
using the following assumptions: weighted average expected life of one year,
volatility of 153%, rate of quarterly dividends 0%, risk free interest rate
of
4.30%.
At
the
end of each reporting period, the value of the warrants is re-measured based
on
the fair value of the underlying shares, and changes to the warrant liability
and related “gain or loss in fair value of the warrants” is recorded as a
non-cash charge or credit to earnings. The warrant liability will be
reclassified to shareholders’ equity when the Company is no longer subject to
performance under the registration rights agreement.
At
June
30, 2006, the warrant liability was $3,678,278, due to changes in the fair
value
of the warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Black
Scholes option-pricing model, with the following assumptions for the year
ended
June 30, 2006: risk-free interest rate of 4.17% dividend yield of 0%, expected
life of 1 year and volatility of 138% were used.
F-27
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
ii) Common Stock Issued With Registration Rights
(Continued)
For
the
year ended June 30, 2006, the non-cash loss on fair value of warrants was
$139,220. The loss on fair value of warrants is due principally to the decrease
in the market value of the common stock of the Company and a decrease in
the
volatility factor used in the Black Scholes valuation of the warrants. The
non-cash loss on fair value of warrants, recorded as loss on fair value of
warrant derivatives, has no effect on the Company’s cash flows or
liquidity.
iii)
Stock
Options
On
February 14, 2006 the Company approved the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”)
for directors, employees and consultants of the Company. The Company has
reserved up to 20,000,000 shares of common stock of its unissued share capital
for the Plan. Other limitations are as follows:
|
a)
|
No
more than 10,000.000 options can be granted for the purchase of
restricted common shares.
|
|
b)
|
No
more than 8,000,000 options can be granted to any one
person.
|
| c) |
No
more than 5,000,000 options can be granted to any one person
for the
purchase of restricted common
shares.
|
On
July 17, 2006, the Company amended its stock plan. The Company has now
reserved 75,000,000 shares of common stock of its unissued share capital
for the
Plan. Other limitations are as follows:
|
a)
|
No
more than 37,500,000 options can be granted for the purchase of
restricted common shares.
|
|
b)
|
No
more than 8,000,000 options can be granted to any one
person.
|
| c) |
No
more than 5,000,000 options can be granted to any one person
for the
purchase of restricted common
shares.
|
F-28
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
iii) Stock
Options (Continued)
At
June,
30, 2006, the Company has a stock-based employee and director compensation
plan,
which is described above. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provision of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123(R)”). In March 2005,
the SEC staff expressed their views with respect to FAS No. 123(R) in Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment”, (SAB 107). SAB 107
provides guidance on valuing options. The impact of adopting FAS No.
123(R) for the year ended June 30, 2006 was to record a non-cash compensation
expense of $726,229. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of
APB
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and
related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation” (“FAS 123”). In accordance with APB 25, no
compensation cost was required to be recognized for options granted that
had an
exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on
the
date of grant. The Company adopted FAS 123(R) using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method,
compensation cost recognized in future interim and annual reporting periods
includes: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior
to,
but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January
1,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of FAS 123(R).
The
adoption of FAS 123(R) had no effect on cash flow from operations or cash
flow
from financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2006. FAS 123(R) requires
the cash flows from tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess
of the
compensation cost recognized for those options (“excess tax benefits”) to be
classified as financing cash flows. Prior to the adoptions of FAS 123(R),
excess tax benefits would have been classified as operating cash inflows.
The Company has not recognized,
and do not expect to recognize in the near future, any tax benefit related
to
stock-based compensation costs as a result of the full valuation allowance
on
our net operating loss carryforwards.
F-29
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
iii)
|
Stock
Options (Continued)
|
The
Company recognizes share-based compensation expense for all service-based
awards
with graded vesting schedules on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period for the entire award. Initial accruals of compensation
expense are based on the estimated number of shares for which requisite service
is expected to be rendered. Estimates are revised if subsequent
information indicates that forfeitures will differ from previous estimates,
and
the cumulative effect on compensation cost of a change in the estimated
forfeitures is recognized in the period of the change.
For
awards with service conditions and graded vesting that were granted prior
to the
adoption of FAS 123(R), the Company estimate the requisite service period
and
the number of shares expected to vest and recognize compensation expense
for
each tranche on a straight-line basis over the estimated requisite service
period. The Company will continue to recognize compensation expense over
the applicable vesting periods for awards granted prior to adoption of FAS
No.
123(R), but for all awards granted after December 31, 2005, compensation
expense
will be recognized over the requisite service period of the award or over
a
period ending with an employee’s eligible retirement date, if earlier.
Adjustments to compensation expense as a result of revising the estimated
requisite service period are recognized prospectively.
Total
stock options outstanding at June 30, 2006 were 10,425,000 of which 1,669,445
of
these options were vested.
Stock
option transactions to the employees, directors, advisory board members and
consultants are summarized as follows:
|
JUNE
30
|
||
|
2006
|
2005
|
|
|
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
-
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
10,425,000
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
at end of year
|
10,425,000
|
-
|
|
Options
exercisable at end of year
|
1,669,445
|
-
|
F-30
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
iii)
|
Stock
Options (Continued)
|
The
above
table includes options issued as of June 30, 2006 as follows:
| · |
A
total of 2,350,000 non-qualified 10 year options have been issued
to
advisory board members at exercise prices of $0.50 to $0.64 a share
and a
weighted average exercise price and fair value per share of $0.62
and
$0.62 respectively;
|
| · |
A
total of 8,075,000 non-qualified 10 year options have been issued
to
directors and officers of the Company, at exercise prices of $0.50
to
$0.80 per share and a weighted average exercise price and fair
value per
share of $0.77 and $0.79 respectively. From this total, 7,200,000
options
were issued on February 14, 2006, with a remaining contractual
life of 9.6
years. All other options issued have a remaining contractual life
of 9.9
years.
|
The
following table provides certain information with respect to the
above-referenced stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30,
2006:
|
Exercise
Prices
|
Stock
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life - Years
|
|
$0.50
|
5,556
|
9.9
|
|
$0.51
|
13,889
|
9.9
|
|
$0.80
|
1,650,000
|
9.6
|
|
Total
|
1,669,445
|
There
have been no modifications of outstanding stock option rewards.
F-31
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
iii)
|
Stock
Options (Continued)
|
Assumptions
used in the option-pricing model are as follows:
|
2006
|
|
|
Average
risk-free interest rate
|
4.30%
- 4.35%
|
|
Average
expected life
|
5
years
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
279%
- 284%
|
|
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
During
the year ended June 30, 2006, $726,229 was recorded as stock-based compensation
expense (non-deductible for tax purposes) to the statement of operations
as the
result of stock option grants. The Company presently expects all employees
to
exercise their options and the expected term of the option to be the contractual
life of the option.
|
iv)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
| a) |
On
February 14, 2006, the Company, pursuant to an employment agreement
granted its Chief Executive Officer and director options to purchase
7,200,000 shares at $0.80 per share. The options will vest over
a period
of 42 months; with 900,000 options vesting immediately and 150,000
options
vesting each month thereafter. As at June 30, 2006, stock-based
compensation of $647,133 has been recorded, in accordance with
SFAS 123R,
to the statement of operations as a result of this
grant.
|
|
b)
|
On
April 24, 2006, the Company issued to its Chief Executive Officer
and
Director an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted
common stock. The shares were valued at $4,150,000 ($0.83 per share)
using
the closing stock price on the date of the employment agreement.
This
stock issuance resulted in the Company having a payroll tax liability,
see
note 6.
|
| c) |
On
June 13, 2006, the Company entered into a consulting agreement
with
interim Acting Chief Financial Officer whereby they are committed
to issue
an aggregate of 75,000 shares of restricted common stock. As at
June 30,
2006, this stock has not been issued, but has been accrued for
on the
balance sheet as common stock reserved for future issuance. The
value of
the stock was calculated using the closing share price on the date
of the
agreement, for a total commitment of $35,250 ($0.47 per share).
The stock
was issued subsequent to the Company’s year end, see Note
9(vi).
|
F-32
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
iv)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
On
June
13, 2006, this individual was granted options to purchase 350,000 shares
at
$0.51 per share. The options will vest over a period of 36 months; with 9,722
options vesting each month. As at June 30, 2006, stock-based compensation
of
$4,562 has been recorded to the statement of operations as a result of this
grant.
| d) |
On
June 5, 2006, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with its
Chief Operating Officer and Director whereby they are committed
to issue
an aggregate of 75,000 shares of restricted common stock. As at
June 30,
2006, this stock has not been issued, but has been accrued for
on the
balance sheet as common stock reserved for issuance. The value
of the
stock was calculated using the closing share price on the date
of the
agreement, for a total commitment of $38,250 ($0.51 per share).
The stock
was issued subsequent to the Company’s year end, see Note
9(vi).
|
On
June
5, 2006, this individual was granted options to purchase 525,000 shares at
$0.47
per share. The options will vest over a period of 36 months; with 87,500
options
vesting 6 months from the grant date, and 14,583 options vesting each month
thereafter. As at June 30, 2006, stock-based compensation of $7,427 has been
recorded to the statement of operations as a result of this grant.
| e) |
On
June 20, 2006, the Company granted an advisory board member options
to
purchase 150,000 shares at $0.51 per share. The options will vest
over a
period of 36 months; with 4,167 options vesting each month. As
at June 30,
2006, stock-based compensation of $1,997 has been recorded to the
statement of operations as a result of this
grant.
|
| f) |
On
June 19, 2006, the Company granted an advisory board member options
to
purchase 200,000 shares at $0.50 per share. The options will vest
over a
period of 36 months; with 5,556 options vesting each month. As
at June 30,
2006, stock-based compensation of $2,773 has been recorded to the
statement of operations as a result of this
grant.
|
| g) |
On
April 25, 2006, the Company granted an advisory board member options
to
purchase 2,000,000 shares at $0.64 per share. The options will
vest over a
period of 42 months; with 500,000 options vesting on October 1,
2006 and
41,667 options vesting each month thereafter. As at June 30, 2006,
stock-based compensation of $62,337 has been recorded to the statement
of
operations as a result of this
grant.
|
F-33
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
v)
|
Warrants
|
During
the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the board of directors approved the
issuance of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 23,272,279 shares of the
Company’s common stock. Such warrants are exercisable at prices ranging from
$0.30 to $0.65 per share, vest immediately, and expire at various times through
May 10, 2007.
During
the years ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, there were no warrants exercised
to purchase stock of the Company.
A
summary
of warrant activity for 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
Number
of Warrants
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding,
June 30, 2004
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
20,000,000
|
$0.05
|
20,000,000
|
$0.05
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Outstanding,
June 30, 2005
|
20,000,000
|
$0.05
|
20,000,000
|
$0.05
|
|
Granted
|
23,272,279
|
$0.60
|
23,272,279
|
$0.60
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
(20,000,000)
|
-
|
(20,000,000)
|
-
|
|
Outstanding,
June 30, 2006
|
23,272,279
|
$0.60
|
23,272,279
|
$0.60
|
At
June
30, 2006 the range of warrant prices for shares under warrants and the
weighted-average remaining contractual life is as follows:
|
Warrants
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
||
|
Warrants
- Exercise Price
|
Number
of Warrants
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life - Years
|
|
$0.30
|
2,104,999
|
0.40
|
|
$0.50
|
2,104,166
|
0.75
|
|
$0.65
|
19,063,114
|
0.86
|
|
Total
|
23,272,279
|
|
F-34
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
9.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (Continued)
|
|
v)
|
Warrants
(Continued)
|
The
investors in the November 23, 2005, March 30, 2006 and May 4, 2006 private
placements received detachable warrants for the purchase of 2,104,999, 1,687,499
and 19,063,114 (including the 733,196 penalty warrants - see note 9(ii))
shares
of common stock, respectively, which were valued at $127,467, $281,117 and
$3,678,278, respectively. For purposes of estimating the intrinsic fair value
of
each warrant as of dates of the private placements, the Company utilized
the
Black Scholes option-pricing model. The Company estimated the fair value
of the
warrants assuming no expected dividends and the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
2006
|
|
Average
risk-free interest rate
|
2.86%
- 4.30%
|
|
Average
expected life
|
1
year
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
142%
- 153%
|
|
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
|
vi)
|
Common
Stock and Warrants reserved for Future
Issuance
|
Common
stock and warrants reserved for future issuance consists of:
|
SHARES
OF
|
STOCK
|
|||
|
COMMON
|
PURCHASE
|
|||
|
STOCK
|
WARRANTS
|
AMOUNT
|
||
|
Consulting
|
3,182,291
|
-
|
$
|
1,587,500
|
|
Settlement
of lawsuit - see Note 13(f)
|
215,000
|
107,500
|
146,445
|
|
|
Employment
agreements - see Note 9(iv)(c) and Note 9(iv)(d)
|
150,000
|
-
|
73,500
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
3,547,291
|
107,500
|
$
|
1,807,445
|
On
June
10, 2006, the Company reserved 3,000,000 shares of restricted common stock
for
issuance to a consultant. These shares were valued at $1,500,000 ($0.50 per
share).
F-35
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
10.
|
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
|
On
January 11, 2006 the Company issued an aggregate of 3,100,000 common shares
to
various consultants at $0.17 per share pursuant to various consulting
agreements. A portion of these shares were issued on an accelerated basis.
Amortization is taken on a monthly basis over the remainder of the terms.
As of
June 30, 2006, $83,328 has been recorded as deferred stock compensation,
see
notes 9 (i) (q) and 9(i) (u) for these stock issuances.
| 11. |
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The
following summarizes all related party transactions of the Company for the
years
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, unless specifically disclosed
elsewhere.
The
Company carried out a number of transactions with related parties in the
normal
course of business. These transactions were recorded at their exchange amount,
which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related
parties.
| a) |
During
the year ended June 30, 2006, an officer and director of the Company
made
payments on behalf of the Company in the amount of $51,613. These
amounts
were advanced without interest and are due on demand. A total of
$50,000
was reimbursed to this individual through cash payment and the
issuance of
common stock.
|
Pursuant
to the consulting
agreement, the Company incurred $18,000 in consulting fees to a related party
during the year. Of the consulting fees incurred, $6,000 was paid in cash,
while
the remainder was owing as at June 30, 2006. The total amount payable to
this
individual as at June 30, 2006 is $13,613.
During
the year
ended June 30, 2006, a stockholder was issued on aggregate of 2,050,000 common
shares of the Company for consulting services rendered. The value of these
services totaled $348,500 ($0.17 per share).
| b) |
During
the year
ended June 30, 2006, officer and director of the Company was paid
$100,000
in cash and issued 1,000,000 restricted common shares of the Company
pursuant to the mineral property agreement discussed in Note 7(b).
|
The
Company incurred $28,000 in consulting fees to this individual for the year
ended June 30, 2006. Of the consulting fees incurred, $24,000 was in paid
in
cash, while the remainder was owing as at June 30, 2006.The total amount
payable
to this individual as at June 30, 2006 is $4,000.
During
the year ended June 30, 2006, this individual was issued an aggregate 1,000,000
common shares of the Company for consulting services rendered. The value
of
these services totalled $170,000 ($0.17 per share).
F-36
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
| 11. |
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(Continued)
|
|
c)
|
During
the year ended June 30, 2006, the Company paid
or
accrued a total of $32,932 in consulting fees to one of its officers,
of
which $21,572 remains payable as of the year end.
|
All
amounts owing to related parties as at June 30, 2006 are unsecured, non-interest
bearing and are payable on demand.
|
12.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE ON NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
During
the year ended June 30, 2006 the Company had the following non-cash financing
and investing activities:
| a) |
The
Company issued 6,000,000 common shares to two individuals for mineral
property acquisition costs with value of $1,610,000 as described
in Notes
7(a), 7(b) and 7(c). On February 20, 2006, 5,000,000 of these shares
were
purchased and returned to the Company’s treasury for
cancellation.
|
| b) |
The
Company issued 250,000 shares to settle a liability of $37,500,see
Note
9(i)(g).
|
13. COMMITMENTS
|
a)
|
On
February 1, 2006 the Company entered into an employment contract
with an
individual whereby the Company is obligated to pay $600 per week
for a
period of one year.
|
|
b)
|
On
January 24, 2006 the Company entered into an employment contract
with an
individual whereby the Company is obligated to pay $600 per week
for a
period of one year.
|
| c) |
The
Company has employment agreements with its executive officers,
the terms
of which expire at various times through February 28, 2011. Such
agreements, which have been revised from time to time, provide
for minimum
salary levels as well as for incentive bonuses that are payable
if
specified management goals are attained.
|
| d) |
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company indemnify
its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences that
happen
by reason of the fact that the officer or director is, was, or
has agreed
to serve as an officer or director of the Company. The Company
has a
Director and Officer insurance policy that limits its exposure
and enables
the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
|
F-37
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
13. COMMITMENTS (Continued)
| e) |
The
Company has a contractual obligation to lease office space until
April 30,
2007 on a monthly basis. Payment of $1,800 per month is
required.
|
f)
On March 31, 2006, the Company, Thorium Power and their respective officers
were served, through their counsel, with a verified complaint by Raj Pamnani.
Mr. Pamnani alleges that the Company and Thorium Power and their respective
officers breached an oral consulting agreement he alleges was entered into
between Mr. Pamnani and the Company and demands a combination of shares of
unrestricted common stock of Novastar and payment of monetary damages in
the
amount of $10 million plus an additional $5 million in punitive damages.
The
action was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of
New
York, and the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint on May 23,
2006.
On August 8, 2006, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement whereby
Mr.
Pamnani irrevocably and forever waived and released any and all claims against
the Company, Thorium Power and the other defendants named in the complaint,
through the date of execution of the Settlement Agreement, in return for
the
issuance of 215,000 shares of common stock of the Company, as well as warrants
to purchase 107,500 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.48
per
share, see Note 9(vi). The total expense, recorded in 2006 in legal settlement
expense was $146,445.
|
14.
|
DEFINITIVE
MERGER AGREEMENT
|
On
February 14, 2006 the Company entered into a Definitive Merger Agreement
(“Agreement and Plan of Merger”) for a business combination with Thorium Power
Inc. (“Thorium
Power”). Under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, each common share of Thorium
Power will be converted into securities of the Company pursuant to a conversion
ratio formula. The combined company will operate under the name of Thorium
Power
Ltd. The merger transaction is subject to certain conditions precedent,
including an increase in the Company’s authorized share capital and the
declaration of the effectiveness of a registration statement by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Other conditions precedent include that since January
1, 2006 the Company shall have raised at least $2,750,000 in an equity financing
transaction (raised as of June 30, 2006), and shall have invested at least
$1,350,000 in Thorium Power common stock at a price per share of $4 (invested
as
of June 30, 2006), see Note 5.
F-38
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
14.
|
DEFINITIVE
MERGER AGREEMENT
(Continued)
|
Subsequent
to the year ended June 30, 2006, a majority of the shareholders of Thorium
Power
Inc. voted in favor of the business combination. The total common shares
of the
Company to be issued at the merger date to the Thorium Power stockholders
will
be 135,638,023.
|
15.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
Deferred
tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. Realization of the deferred income tax asset
is
dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in future years. Although
realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not
that
all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized. The Company currently
has substantial net operating loss carryforwards. The Company has taken a
100%
valuation allowance against all of its deferred tax assets. For the year
ended
June 30, 2006, the valuation allowance, based on the federal statutory tax
rate
of 35% (2005 - 35%), increased approximately $1,582,000 (2005 - $900,000).
As
of
June 30, 2006, the Company has an available federal net operating loss
carryforward to offset future taxable income, if any, of approximately
$17,500,000 (2005 - $4,000,000). The federal net operating loss carryforwards
expire during the years 2020 through 2026. The utilization of the Company’s net
operating loss will be subject to a substantial limitation due to the “Change of
Ownership Provisions” under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such
limitation will most likely result in the expiration of most of the net
operating loss carryforward before its utilization.
A
reconciliation between the amount of income tax benefit, determined by applying
the applicable U.S. statutory income tax rate of 35%, to the pre-tax book
loss
is as follows:
|
Year
ended June 30
|
|||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
Federal
statutory rate
|
$
|
(4,670,587
|
)
|
$
|
(942,031
|
)
|
|
|
Nondeductible
stock - based compensation
|
2,854,180
|
0
|
|||||
|
Impairment
loss on mineral acquisition assets
|
234,690
|
0
|
|||||
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
1,581,717
|
942,031 | |||||
|
Total
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
|||
|
16.
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
The
following summarizes all of the Company’s subsequent events, unless specifically
disclosed elsewhere.
| a) |
On
July 7, 2006, the Company’s board of directors approved a proposal to
amend the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of common stock from 250,000,000 shares to 500,000,000
shares and to amend the total shares authorized to be issued under
the
2006 stock option plan from 20 million shares to 75 million shares.
This
amendment and other proposals will be voted on by the stockholders
on
October 5, 2006.
|
F-39
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES LTD.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2006 AND 2005
|
16.
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
(Continued)
|
| b) |
On
July 3, 2006, the Company granted a total of 4,000,000 stock options
to
its international advisory board members. The stock options will
be
exercisable at $0.445 per share and will expire five years after
the date
of grant.
|
| c) |
On
July 27, 2006, the Company granted 3,750,000 stock options to two
executives pursuant to employment agreements entered into subsequently.
The options will be exercisable at $0.49 per share and will expire
ten
years after the date of grant. The Company also issued 1,500,000
shares to
one of these employees pursuant to their employment
agreement.
|
| d) |
On
July 15, 2006, the Company granted 600,000 stock options to an
employee
pursuant to an employment
agreement.
|
| e) |
On
August 8, 2006, the Company amended the Agreement and Plan of Merger
with
Thorium Power Inc. by changing the share exchange ratio with the
Thorium
Power stockholders. Pursuant to the merger the Thorium Power stockholders
will have the right to receive 25.628 shares of the Company's stock
for 1
share of Thorium Power stock.
|
| f) |
On
July 1, 2006, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for
financial advisory services, for a 1 year period. As compensation
for the
services to be provided, the Company issued 850,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock, pursuant to Company’s Amended and Restated Stock
Plan. The shares shall vest in equal monthly installments from
the date of
the agreement.
|
| g) |
On
July 18, 2006, the Company entered into consulting agreements with
two
individuals for financial advisory services to be provided for
a 1 year
period. As compensation for the services to be provided, the Company
issued a total of 285,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common
stock.
|
F-40
NOVASTAR
RESOURCES, LTD.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Basis
of Presentation
On
February 14, 2006, Novastar Resources Ltd., entered into a Share Exchange
Agreement with Thorium Power Inc. and its stockholders, pursuant to which
Novastar Resources Ltd. acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital
stock
of Thorium Power Inc. in exchange for a total of 135,638,023 shares of
our
common stock, constituting 54.5% shares of Novastar Resources Ltd. issued
and
outstanding common stock at the time of the merger agreement, $0.001 par
value
per share.
Novastar
Resources Ltd expects to complete the acquisition of Thorium Power Inc.,
pursuant to the Merger Agreement, in October 2006. The acquisition will
be
accounted for as a reverse merger effected by a share exchange, wherein
Thorium
Power Inc. is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting
purposes.
The
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements of Novastar Resources
Ltd
in the opinion of management include all material adjustments directly
attributable to the share exchange contemplated by the Agreement. The unaudited
pro forma consolidated balance sheet reflects the financial position of
the
company had the merger occurred on June 30, 2006. The pro forma consolidated
statements of operations were prepared as if the transactions were consummated
on June 30, 2005. These pro forma consolidated financial statements have
been
prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative
of
the results of operations which actually would have resulted had the transaction
occurred on the date indicated and are not necessarily indicative of the
results
that may be expected in the future.
F-41
|
Novastar
Resources Ltd.
|
|
June
30, 2006
|
Note:
The merger for accounting purposes will be treated as a recapitalization
of
Thorium Power Inc.
|
Pro
Forma
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Novastar
|
|
Thorium
|
|
Total
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
Pro
Forma
|
|||||||||||
|
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Currrent
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
14,431,407
|
$
|
528,213
|
$
|
14,959,620
|
$
|
0
|
14,959,620
|
||||||||||
|
Prepaid
Expenses and othr current assets
|
808,425
|
990
|
809,415
|
0
|
809,415
|
||||||||||||||
|
Due
From Novastar Resources Inc.
|
0
|
264,740
|
264,740
|
5
|
(264,740
|
)
|
0
|
||||||||||||
|
Total
Current Assets
|
15,239,832
|
793,943
|
16,033,775
|
(264,740
|
)
|
15,769,035
|
|||||||||||||
|
Property
Plant and Equipment -net
|
0
|
21,534
|
21,534
|
21,534
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment
in Thorium Power
|
1,350,000
|
0
|
1,350,000
|
1
|
(1,350,000
|
)
|
0
|
||||||||||||
|
Patent
Costs - net
|
0
|
209,311
|
209,311
|
209,311
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Security
Deposits
|
0
|
7,567
|
7,567
|
7,567
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
Other Assets
|
1,350,000
|
216,878
|
1,566,878
|
(1,350,000
|
)
|
216,878
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
Assets
|
$ |
16,589,832
|
$ |
1,032,355
|
$ |
17,622,187
|
$ |
(1,614,740
|
)
|
$
|
16,007,447
|
||||||||
|
Liabilities
and Stockholdes Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Current
portion long term debt
|
$ |
0
|
$ |
3,913
|
$ |
3,913
|
$ |
3,913
|
|||||||||||
|
Accounts
Payable
|
463,354
|
131,478
|
594,832
|
594,832
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Accrued
Liabilities
|
103,541
|
336,502
|
440,043
|
440,043
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Due
to related party
|
128,675
|
17,500
|
146,175
|
146,175
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Accrued
payroll tax and other liability
|
635,000
|
5,983
|
640,983
|
640,983
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Warrant
Liability
|
3,678,278
|
0
|
3,678,278
|
3,678,278
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Due
to Thorium Power Inc.
|
264,740
|
0
|
264,740
|
5
|
(264,740
|
)
|
0
|
||||||||||||
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
5,273,588
|
495,376
|
5,768,964
|
(264,740
|
)
|
5,504,224
|
|||||||||||||
|
Notes
Payable - long term
|
0
|
12,657
|
12,657
|
0
|
12,657
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
Liabilites
|
5,273,588
|
508,033
|
5,781,621
|
(264,740
|
)
|
5,516,881
|
|||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock with Registration Rights
|
12,041,373
|
0
|
12,041,373
|
12,041,373
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock
|
118,101
|
192,626
|
310,727
|
253,739
|
|||||||||||||||
|
1
|
(8,750
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
135,638
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
(183,876
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
Paid in Capital - Stock and Warrants
|
14,913,153
|
16,713,706
|
31,626,859
|
12,850,947
|
|||||||||||||||
|
1
|
(1,341,250
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
(135,638
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
183,876
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated
deficit - development stage
|
(17,482,900
|
)
|
(16,382,010
|
)
|
(33,864,910
|
3
|
17,482,900
|
(16,382,010
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Deferred
stock compensation
|
(83,328
|
)
|
0
|
(83,328
|
(83,328
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock and Warrants reserved future issue
|
1,807,445
|
1,807,445
|
1,807,445
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
2,400
|
2,400
|
2,400
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
Stockholders Equity
|
(725,129
|
)
|
524,322
|
(200,807
|
(1,350,000
|
)
|
(1,550,807
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
$ |
16,589,832
|
$ |
1,032,355
|
$ |
17,622,187
|
$ |
(1,614,740
|
)
|
$ |
16,007,447
|
||||||||
|
Pro-Forma
Adjustments
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro-Forma
Adjustment - 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock - Thorium
|
8,750
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Additonal
Paid in Capital - Thorium
|
1,341,250
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment
- Thorium Power
|
1,350,000
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
To
eliminate Novastar's investment in Thorium
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
175,000
shares at $4 per share
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro-Forma
Adjustment - 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
paid in Capital
|
135,638
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock
|
135,638
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
To
record the issuance of Novastar stock pursuant to the merger agreement
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Novastar
will issue 135,638,023 common shares at $.001 par value granting
Thorium
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Sharholders
a 54.5% interest in Novastar, prior to the private placement. In
addition,
Thorium management will control
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
the
combined entity and Board of Directors, therefore this will be
accounted
for as a recapitalization of Thorium Power Inc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Novastar
was a shell with minimal assets prior to the merger agreement and
the
fundraising that took place after the merger agreement
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro-Forma
Adjustment - 3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
Paid in Captial - Novastar
|
17,482,900
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Retained
Earnings - Novastar
|
17,482,900
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
To
eliminate Novastar's retained earnings
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro-Forma
Adjustment - 4
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock - Thorium
|
183,876
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Additonal
Paid In Capital
|
183,876
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
To
eliminate Thorium's capital stock - recapitalization
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
March
31, 2006 Balance 192,626
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Elimin.
Of Novastar Invest (8,750)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro-Forma
Adjustment - 5
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Due
to Thorium Power Inc.
|
264,740
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Due
from Novastar Resources Ltd
|
264,740
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
To
eliminate interco. balance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
F-42
|
Novastar
Resources Ltd.
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
Pro
Forma
|
|||||||||||||
|
Novastar
|
Thorium
|
Adjustment
|
Pro
Forma
|
||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ |
0
|
$ |
0
|
$ | $ |
0
|
||||||
|
Operating
Expenses
|
$ |
13,147,485
|
$ |
755,714
|
$ | $ |
13,903,199
|
||||||
|
Other
Income and Expense
|
$ |
197,050
|
$ |
803,867
|
$ | $ |
1,000,917
|
||||||
|
Net
Loss
|
$ |
13,344,535
|
$ |
1,559,581
|
$ | $ |
14,904,116
|
||||||
|
Basic
and Dilluted Loss Per Share
|
$ |
0.12
|
$ | $ | $ |
0.06
|
|||||||
|
Common
Shares Outstanding
|
111,913,155
|
1 |
135,638,023
|
247,551,178
|
|||||||||
Proforma
Adjustment - 1
Novastar
outstanding shares are restated to reflect the shares to be issued
in the
reverse merger, 135,638,023 and total outstanding shares post
merger
F-42
Consent
of Telford Sadovnick, P.L.L.C.
The
Board
of Directors
Novastar
Resources Ltd.
(An
Exploration Stage Company)
We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-135842 and No. 333-137421 on Form S-8, dated July 18, 2006, and September
19, 2006, respectively, of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Novastar Resources Ltd. and subsidiaries (the "Company")
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
ended
June 30, 2006.
TELFORD
SADOVNICK, P.L.L.C.
CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Bellingham,
Washington
September
25, 2006
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer
I,
Seth
Grae, certify that:
|
a.
|
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being
prepared;
|
|
b.
|
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
|
c.
|
Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's
most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting;
and
|
|
a.
|
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
|
b.
|
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial
reporting.
|
Date:
September 27,
2006
/s/
Seth Grae
Seth
Grae, Principal Executive Officer
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer
I,
Larry
Goldman, certify that:
1. I
have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Novastar Resources
Ltd.;
2. Based
on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
|
a.
|
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being
prepared;
|
|
b.
|
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
|
c.
|
Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's
most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting;
and
|
5. The
small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
|
a.
|
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
|
b.
|
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial
reporting.
|
Date:
September 27,
2006
/s/
Larry Goldman
Larry
Goldman, Principal Financial Officer
Section
1350 Certifications
STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The
undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
Officer of Novastar Resources Ltd. This Certification is made pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Novastar Resources Ltd. for the year ended
June 30, 2006.
The
undersigned certifies that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in
all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Novastar
Resources Ltd. as of June 30, 2006.
This
Certification is executed as of September 27,
2006.
By:
/s/ Seth Grae
-----------------------------------------
Name:
Seth Grae
Title:
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal
Executive Officer)
By:
/s/ Larry Goldman
-----------------------------------------
Name:
Larry Goldman
Title:
Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
A
signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to
Novastar Resources Ltd. and will be retained by Novastar and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.